Even during his time at Yorkshire you could see he improved a lot and looked much more comfortable with his game, much improved player from those early days when he first came up.I'd rather field without a box and a helmet at silly mid-off than get married young.
Always been one of those "see ball, hit ball" types, iirc. The commies have hyped him a lot but even in the 2004-2006, swing bowlers like Hoggard, Flintoff and even nondescripts like Sreesanth regularly exposed him.
While I definitely think that (as usual) the criticism of the Australian bowlers in general has been a little over the top, I don't think that has really been the problem in the session. Neither attacking too much or defending too much will see you bowl a leg stump half-volley; that's just crap bowling. And that's what's been happening.Before anyone goes after the bowling too hard, let's not forget who only scored 280-odd, propped-up enormously by the utter gun-like knock by one ****. It's always difficult to find the right combination of attack and defense when you're defending s crap total.
shut it ****cant have it both ways spikey
only from one bowlerAnd that's what's been happening.
I've said it before but I reckon that's a lot of the problem with Johnson. He's swung the ball for one series in his entire career and ever since then he's moved heaven and earth to try and replicate it, forgetting the fact that he was quite a good bowler before that when he just bowled - for lack of a better description - really fast off-cutters. His natural undercut and scrambled seam (somewhat oddly) moves the ball away from the right handers consistently and before everyone got inside his head telling him he had to swing the ball back to be dangerous he regularly got good batsmen out just by bowling hostile stuff on off stump that moved away with his unorthodox angle and undercut. South Africa's tour of Australia before the famous return trip saw IMO Johnson's "best" bowling from a what-he-should-be-aiming-for perspective.Probably Clarke will persist with Johnson even post lunch. If he finds his elusive holy grail - the late inswinger - he can be a handful.
Yeah agree. It's the lack of movement which is the main problem anyway. Mitch has been pretty ****, but Siddle and Harris have at least bowled in decent areas.While I definitely think that (as usual) the criticism of the Australian bowlers in general has been a little over the top, I don't think that has really been the problem in the session. Neither attacking too much or defending too much will see you bowl a leg stump half-volley; that's just crap bowling. And that's what's been happening.
Yeah but apparently anyone who played in the last Ashes is evil.didn't he also take 5 wickets in an innings in the last test in lanka?