I think it's somewhere in between what you've said and the over-critical bunch that are used to watching McGrath, Warne, Lee, Gillespie, etc. Harris is very good for me, and Siddle can do a job also, think MJ's position should be under real scrutiny, while the spinner's slot is still anyone's guess. Watson is a decent enough fifth-bowling option too.Am I the only person who thinks Australia has a good attack?
They got pasted in the Ashes true, but even then there were some good performances.
Yeah, they were all in the same test. We were horribly inconsistent in The Ashes, bowled both sides of the wicket and couldn't settle on a length. Our attack will be good again when they work out that bowling in and around off-stump for a decent length of time is a smart thing to do.Am I the only person who thinks Australia has a good attack?
They got pasted in the Ashes true, but even then there were some good performances.
HowSTAT! Player Bowling GraphBull. They didn't step up in the Ashes. That's it.
Ponting b Southee 0 (1)
It's going to happen.
I told you we should have opened with him! Bring Hussey on!wato on good move
gonna **** up someones when he gets runs he gets wickets graph tbhWatto
If the selectors thought Watto could play as a frontline bowler they'd probably just drop Siddle for Smith.Heres an idea:
Khawaja to open, Watson to replace Johnson as a strike bowler and bat way down the order. Ingenious or crazy stupid ****? Probably the latter, but oh well.