I certainly wouldn't if I was the batsman either; I'm talking about from an umpiring perspective. The replays should have to disprove the claimed catch rather than prove it.Crazy talk. Srs. If I was Taylor in a tense Test, no way would I take the word of some **** claiming a catch.
Yeah lets be serious, if you do that these days your pretty much a moron. An honourable moron.Crazy talk. Srs. If I was Taylor in a tense Test, no way would I take the word of some **** claiming a catch.
Yawn, NZ have stuffed themselves here. No Test has ever been decided by one ball.Yeah lets be serious, if you do that these days your pretty much a moron. An honourable moron.
I'm pretty sure they had better 3rd umpires and cameramen back in the dark ages, tbh.
Heck, Dean du Plessis could tell it was out.
If you take that stance and make it public though, players might start celebrating even when they know they haven't caught it in the hope that replays are inconclusive.I certainly wouldn't if I was the batsman either; I'm talking about from an umpiring perspective. The replays should have to disprove the claimed catch rather than prove it.
I wasn't suggesting that we abandon replays and go by the fielder's word for everything; just when the replays are inconclusive.
There's still a massive stigma involved with falsely claiming a catch though so if they were proven wrong it's a big black mark against them. Don't think it'd happen that often.If you take that stance and make it public though, players might start celebrating even when they know they haven't caught it in the hope that replays are inconclusive.
He would've left it, tbf.Justice. not the Zimbo player either.