• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Butt/Amir/Asif - Spot Fixing Trial

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Tbf, as to the first point the substance was banned too, so doesn't make that much of a difference.

And as for the second point, yes it is wrongdoing. It may not have been in the rules at the time, i am not sure but Marlon Samuels was banned for a year or 2 just recently for doing exactly the same, infact for just having contact with a bookie despite there being not any clear evidence of taking money unlike with Warne, May and Waugh.

Not that i agree with the comparison, but in isolation those instances were clear cases of wrongdoing too, where they got away despite recommendations of a ban from a independent commision Cricket Australia set up itself. And Tim May is the current FICA head too iirc.
I don't want to derail the thread, but have to briefly respond.

Diuretics are only banned in sports (where the competitors' weight isn't a factor) because they can potentially mask performance enhancing drugs. Taking a substance that makes you dehydrate isn't likely to be beneficial in a sport like cricket where the taking on of fluids is pretty important to maintain performance.

A very reasonable inference is that Warne quite possibly did take steroids to speed the recovery of his dislocated shoulder and then took the diet pills to mask this, but there's no definite proof of this, just a balance of probability. That his ban was reduced to one year from a potential two on the strength of his **** and bull story was frankly farcical. But there it is; one suspects but one can't know.

WRT taking the money from the bookmaker, it was very naive and greedy, but not necessarily evidence in and of itself of anything untoward. One might well ask why a bookmaker would pay so generously for such relatively benign information and therein lies the rub. Once one takes money from a dubious source it can be used as leverage at a later date.

Samuels was, if you like, made to carry the can for the past sins of others. There's no proof he actively tried to negatively affect the outcome of games in which he played, but after CA's piss weak handling of the Waugh & Warne debacle any consorting with illegal bookmakers is going to be jumped on.

Yeah, all charges will be dropped.
:laugh:

Genuine lol there.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
I have, and I cannot see how you are equating the 2, let alone why you'd do so, let alone trump up what he did to such a level.
 

Agent Nationaux

International Coach
I think his crime was far more serious, since he was the defence minister and committed fraud (are you a tory?). My point was that politicians get away with a slap on the wrist so easily.
 

Agent Nationaux

International Coach
I am just very sad to hear about them going to prison which I think is over the top. But I do agree that life ban is now due because of this guilty verdict.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I am just very sad to hear about them going to prison which I think is over the top. But I do agree that life ban is now due because of this guilty verdict.
How is going to prison over the top?

They broke the law. Not just a piffling ban is good enough. I hope they all get 5 year sentences. It might stop others in future if they think they will lose their freedom if they do the same.
 

Agent Nationaux

International Coach
How is going to prison over the top?

They broke the law. Not just a piffling ban is good enough. I hope they all get 5 year sentences. It might stop others in future if they think they will lose their freedom if they do the same.
If you really want a harsh deterrent then send them to Prison in Pak. There they will get beaten and tortured by the Pak police. :)
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
I think his crime was far more serious, since he was the defence minister and committed fraud (are you a tory?). My point was that politicians get away with a slap on the wrist so easily.
I'm not a Tory, in fact I'm not anything, but I'd hardly say he's got away with anything yet.

What I don't understand is the relevance. It's bad enough reading the crap about Warne and Waugh and trying to excuse these 3 pieces of scum based on that, but now using an unproven allegation against a politician?
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
If Amir, Asif and Butt are sentenced to jail, they should serve it in Pakistan and not the UK.
Well, let's see....they broke UK Law while in UK territory, were investigated by the UK police, were charged in the UK, were tried and convicted in the UK and will be sentenced by a UK court.....

So why in the world would it make sense to serve time in a Pakistani jail?
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
If you really want a harsh deterrent then send them to Prison in Pak. There they will get beaten and tortured by the Pak police. :)
Well, if Pakistani jails are anything like Indian jails, the fact that they have money and are famous, they'd be treated like royalty and it'd almost be like living in a hotel. For a normal person, it's obviously much worse.
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Well, let's see....they broke UK Law while in UK territory, were investigated by the UK police, were charged in the UK, were tried and convicted in the UK and will be sentenced by a UK court.....

So why in the world would it make sense to serve time in a Pakistani jail?
To save the UK taxpayer a few quid - they've cost us enough already
 

Xuhaib

International Coach
I don't care if they go to prison or not but one thing I don't get why should their 5 yr bans be turned in to life time bans by ICC haven't we already established this case verdict had no bearing on ICC bans.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Was a tongue in cheek comment (although I did have a sizeable bet, which I placed before the game, on the Australia game where Hussey and Siddle turned it around)
 

Top