Why would it be a disgrace if they are found not guilty in a fair trial by an unbiased jury? Personally, I think they are guilty. I can't say that they're guilty (or not guilty) for a fact though, and neither can anyone else on the planet save for Majeed and the accused trio. You and I were not part of the jury, we didn't hear all the evidence, and we're basing our opinion of their guilt on hearsay and without being subjected to any legal limitations.Will be disgrace if they get off. Would refuse to pay money to watch them if they visit.
fair point I supposeWhy would it be a disgrace if they are found not guilty in a fair trial by an unbiased jury? Personally, I think they are guilty. I can't say that they're guilty (or not guilty) for a fact though, and neither can anyone else on the planet save for Majeed and the accused trio. You and I were not part of the jury, we didn't hear all the evidence, and we're basing our opinion of their guilt on hearsay and without being subjected to any legal limitations.
Either verdict (guilty or not guilty) would be a result of fair trial according to established procedures. People can certainly agree or disagree with the verdict, but there's no justification to label it as a disgrace IMO.
Sucks that we have juries when we can just convict people through the media, right?Will be disgrace if they get off. Would refuse to pay money to watch them if they visit.
Sucks that we have juries when we can just convict people through the media, right?
.
You do realise that this case has no bearing on their bans don't you?I just have this really weird feeling that Asif could be the one who is let off the hook.The lack of evidence against the man,compared to the one against the others,is astounding.
Either way,i won't complain whatever happens.Of course a selfish part of me wants to see all 3 back,but i won't lose sleep if it doesn't happen.