• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Butt/Amir/Asif - Spot Fixing Trial

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Not if you continue working out. I'll admit I don't really know much at all about roids.
 

Agent Nationaux

International Coach
Asif and Butt's lawyer going at it. Asif is blaming Butt for no-ball (Butt told him to go faster) and Butt's lawyer blaming asif. Lol
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
Spot-fixing controversy: No reliable evidence against Salman Butt - lawyer | Pakistan Cricket News | ESPN Cricinfo
Spot-fixing controversy: Mohammad Amir 'the sacrificial goat' says prosecution | Pakistan Cricket News | ESPN Cricinfo

"When you came into this court room for the first time you all took an oath to say you will give a verdict according to the evidence and nothing but the evidence. In the case of Salman Butt there simply isn't enough evidence to find Salman Butt guilty. There seems to be a fix between Mazhar Majeed and Mohammad Amir and you must decide if that fix involved Mohammad Asif. What reliable evidence does the prosecution have that Salman Butt was involved in the fix of the Lord's no-balls?
Looks like the defense's tactics are on show. Lay it all on Amir. First time I've felt a little bit sorry for him.
 

Fusion

Global Moderator
Can a legal person tell me why Majeed was not put on the stand? Why were the defense attorneys not able to cross-examine him?
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Can a legal person tell me why Majeed was not put on the stand? Why were the defense attorneys not able to cross-examine him?
If, as seems to be the case, Majeed and Amir have pleaded guilty, they are still co-defendants and therefore not compellable witnesses for the prosecution. In those circumstances I'm slightly surprised that they didn't offer to turn Queen's evidence and give evidence for the prosecution, as that would be of some use to them in mitigation. I would think that they chose not to, although it is possible that they made the offer but the CPS decided not to call them
 

Xuhaib

International Coach
From what I have seen from this case Salman and Asif have come across as conniving, scheming snakes who will do whatever they can to get out of this, Aamer on the other hand comes across as a stupid, naive clueless kid who takes the word of anyone be it his agent, captain, colleague or his lawyer.
 

ganeshran

International Debutant
Cant believe Salman Butt had the gall to compare cricket to a piece of trashy entertainment like WWE. Absolutely no respect for the game
 

Faisal1985

International Vice-Captain
Some very strong closing statements...especially Asif's lawyer had a very well worded closing statement...
 

Top