• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* England in India

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
Good catch, but hilarious how the first slip fielder was trying to get his hand between Kieswetter's legs :laugh:
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Being that you've only seen them play against England, on what basis are they not good?
Aaron and Yadav are just raw pace with virtually no other attributes. If they were in the English setup they'd be picked and dropped within about 18 months but would develop a more rounded bowling game after about 2-3 years. In India they'll be picked and dropped every few months and become a one-dimensional trundler in 2-3 years.
 

Jayzamann

International Regular
Yeah, quite often he has to sacrifice himself for the team.
What do you mean by that?

ed: not trying to be a **** here, he's bookended in the order by Kohli and p. much the yardstick for ODI lower order batting.
 
Last edited:

Contra

Cricketer Of The Year
To come in after Kohli?
Uh no, this isn't normally how it plays out, for the majority of his career he's batted at either 6 or 7 (Dhoni and him flip back and forth most of the time). Virat's played at # 3 quite a bit, as well as # 4

So Kohli has had a lot more chances of getting that big score. That's not taking anything from Kohli btw, he's been awesome for us over the last 2 years, just saying that a comparison to Raina isn't valid. Kohli and Gambhir would be a much better comparison.
 

Jayzamann

International Regular
Uh no, this isn't normally how it plays out, for the majority of his career he's batted at either 6 or 7 (Dhoni and him flip back and forth most of the time). Virat's played at # 3 quite a bit, as well as # 4

So Kohli has had a lot more chances of getting that big score. That's not taking anything from Kohli btw, he's been awesome for us over the last 2 years, just saying that a comparison to Raina isn't valid. Kohli and Gambhir would be a much better comparison.
Ahok that's fair enough.

He's at 5 right now because people like Tendulkar aren't playing, right?
 

Top