From where did you get that impression? Aaron is quite up-and-down (from what I've seen) and does not move it in the air either. Pace and some inseam being his only two assets.Yadav is looking good, but he is more of a test bowler, he does bowl a wicket taking delivery with good pace every now and then,but also tends to bowl a few loose deliveries. Varun Aroon bowls with much control. He should have been picked ahead of Yadav for ODIs.
That's fair. Generous towards England if anything; looks a good deck to me.And a run out to end the innings.
About 30/40 runs short atleast, i would say.
I wouldn't be so sure. There's some bounce in the deck and men like Bresnan and Finn could pose quite some problems if they get it right.That's fair. Generous towards England if anything; looks a good deck to me.
They were.Just watching the old ODI here - us vs England from the 99 Ashes.
And I can't help but laugh at Richard saying Nick Knight and Neil
Fairbrother we're better ODI players than Adam Gilchrist.
dead right!Needed that. We need to have them 50-3 minimum though or this will be a cakewalk.
Think we all agree with that, need early wickets though as otherwise Dhoni will come in later and take game away comfortably. Need him in with a bit of pressure on.England cannot contain India on this deck against this total. Their only option is to pick up 10 wickets!