*Official* T20 and ODI matches

[MW1304]

A big hundred from someone would be nice, we don't get many.

Edit: Looks like rain will prevent that.

 

[Turbinator]

My goodness, this is such bull****. Does the Sun ever shine in England?

 

[Jono]

It did when I was there

 

[Neil Pickup]

My goodness, this is such bull****. Does the Sun ever shine in England?

This game isn't being played in England.

 

[Turbinator]

This game isn't being played in England.

Oh true say, just checked the venue. Well let's change England to UK in my question then.

 

[Neil Pickup]

Restart at 7:30. Would imagine that's another 7/8 overs off, leaving us 39/40 overs to get something in the region of 260-270.

 

[superkingdave]

39 overs, target 287

Edit
Ok the actual target is 270 off 40 overs... so 10 overs lost and target reduced by 35

 

[Turbinator]

Yup, 270 in 40 overs.

 

[nsniks]

270 from 40 overs revised target

 

[Bun]

39 overs, target 287

Edit
Ok the actual target is 270 off 40 overs... so 10 overs lost and target reduced by 35

Gorgeous.

For once the luck is on our side I hope.

 

[Howe_zat]

So they're giving us a start of 35/0 after 10. Will take that tbh.

 

[Z-Man]

lmao, this is a joke.
270? 240 would be reasonable.

 

[superkingdave]

lmao, this is a joke.
270? 240 would be reasonable.

Nah 240 would be too far the other way. I think something like 255-260 would seem right. At least the rain came before the start tbh. I wonder what the PPs are reduced to now? 8/4/3?

 

[Neil Pickup]

lmao, this is a joke.
270? 240 would be reasonable.

240 would be the most ridiculous thing on earth, as it would require us to score at lower a run rate from fewer overs.

As it's apparent from that post that you are not aware of the factors involved in adjusting targets, I'm not going to go into justifying the revisions.

 

[Neil Pickup]

Nah 240 would be too far the other way. I think something like 255-260 would seem right. At least the rain came before the start tbh. I wonder what the PPs are reduced to now? 8/4/3?

8/4/4 - everything is 80% of original.

 

[Turbinator]

240 would be the most ridiculous thing on earth, as it would require us to score at lower a run rate from fewer overs.

As it's apparent from that post that you are not aware of the factors involved in adjusting targets, I'm not going to go into justifying the revisions.

Nah, reckon' 230 would be even more ridiculous.

 

[Furball]

Oh true say, just checked the venue. Well let's change England to UK in my question then.

Not at this time of day at this time of year.

 

[Howe_zat]

More showers on their way tonight.

 

[Daemon]

Nah, reckon' 230 would be even more ridiculous.

 

[Jacknife]

You would have thought if they take 10 overs off, it's should be at least worth 50 runs, 5 rpo, so something around 255 would be fair.