Yeah delicious, no doubt about it. Can't go wrong by backing a Murphy.I find it worring a players bowel movements determines your liking for them.
Murphy for Brownlow - Got on him at $46.
Of course the fallacy you speak of is fundamentally wrong because rather than stealing votes off one another, the best players make each other look better and hence poll more votes.Players stealing votes off each other in the Brownlow is such a myth, it's a blatant fallacy.
Let's go through the Brownlow winners of recent times, taking out Judd last year.
Gary Abblett played in the best midfield in the competition.
Cooney had little competition in the midfield.
Bartel best midfield.
Goodes played in a Grand Final team.
Cousins best midfield.
Judd best midfield.
Skip the 3 way tie.
Black best midfield.
Akermanis best midfield
etc etc etc.
The fact is that you generally need to play in the one of the best midfield's in the league. Players around you will make you look better than you maybe already are.
In conclusion, I'm sick of people using the 'he'll steal votes off him so he won't win it' line.
Yeah I had the choice at the start of the year of having Pendlebury or Steele Sidebottom made the wrong callPendlebury is unbelievaaaaaaaaaaaable value imo