Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yuvraj here was the entire lead.Yes the drop of Dravid in the first test and Yuvraj in this one have proved costly.
Yuvraj here was the entire lead.Yes the drop of Dravid in the first test and Yuvraj in this one have proved costly.
Go educate yourself on how DRS works.Is good eye sight extinct? Because those delivering weren't just clipping off, they were CLEANLY hitting the bails. Big difference.
No, it's not fair because 1) it was out and 2) it looked plumb live.
Yup quite true, uncharacteristically bad so far in that dept- not just catches though, but general grounnd fielding, agility in the field etc.Yes the drop of Dravid in the first test and Yuvraj in this one have proved costly.
It's irrelevant whether he has one bad series - your argument is invalid. A batsman who was ranked #1 in the world a month ago clearly does not lose everything and become non-Test class in the span of a month unless he has had some serious injuries. And if he is on a terminal decline, three innings does not imply anything of the sort.whatever. He won't get a single 80+ score this series. avatar bet? 2 weeks?
wow just found out that Broad got a hattrick?
he's single handedly keeping england in the game.
and dravid has to be the best player in english conditions.
scored 3 tons in 2002 tour
2 already this time... amazing (avg of 70+)
imagine if he had been an english...
he was no.1 in Dec/start of Jan!!It's irrelevant whether he has one bad series - your argument is invalid. A batsman who was ranked #1 in the world a month ago clearly does not lose everything and become non-Test class in the span of a month unless he has had some serious injuries. And if he is on a terminal decline, three innings does not imply anything of the sort.
Yes, they were good shouts, but they were turned down for reasons such as not hitting the stumps (a bit like the Cook one in fact which was given)Umm, did you not watch England's batting? Plenty of good lbw shouts were turned down against India.
Nah. Gough bowled both Miller and MacGill.Perfect hat trick in cricket, tbf, is all three batsmen being out.
McGrath's was incredible. All caught, but three top order players, taken apart by three different balls perfectly executed.
As for the question, I think Gough's hat trick at Sydney may have been caught, lb and bowled. But I'm not sure.
I should remember, I was there.
I thought your first post was a bit of joke but you are serious about this...whatever. He won't get a single 80+ score this series. avatar bet? 2 weeks?
wow just found out that Broad got a hattrick?
he's single handedly keeping england in the game.
and dravid has to be the best player in english conditions.
scored 3 tons in 2002 tour
2 already this time... amazing (avg of 70+)
imagine if he had been an english...
Indian ground fielding might not be good but slip catchers are pretty good though.. while England have dropped some dollies.For sure the pitch did ease out. Can;t help but feel though that in a series as tight as this and that (ordinarily) our fielding and running between the wickets are superior to India and this could provide a priceless advantage over the course of the series.
He just played a **** shot yesterday, it happens.In the world cup he had 5 opportunities to get the 100th 100 but he kept choking after a brilliant start to the world cup. (fell 15 runs short in the semifinal)
and now look whats happening to him in England.
basically this milestone hunt will **** him up even more. it's weighing him down
He may not play 80
Bowled a lot of short balls, all were put away for 4. Dravid, despite 1 bottom edge between the keepers legs, also dispatched anything that was wide or too full either, was brilliant play and left him no margin for error. The joy was slightly nullified by comments about 'another spinner killed by the indians' coming thick and fast.EDIT: Disappointed to miss 'Swanneh' getting smashed too...especially the stump destroying. Must've been worse than when he got taken to in Australia.
Totally agree with this...he does a good job in situations where he should help the team get home (i.e: in the last innings on pitches that suit him a bit) but is not as good as a number of people are making him out to be. He's just a decent off-spinner.Psst... Re. Swann...
He ain't that great.
He's by no means awful and is a good bowler, but he's a stock standard offie with an arm ball. But the level of hype around him is crazy.
Generally has one big innings with the ball per series tho, and it may be the second dig here.