All right fair enough, he is joining the MS One Bounce Rule Dhoni's crusade to change cricket rules.Nothing to do with the match at hand. No one mentioned an Australian player.
You're baiting/ trolling
Maybe. They have similar FC averages, fwiw but Bresnan's is a couple of runs higher. I'd plump for the one with more test experience, but it's no big deal I suppose.Yeha, below Swann
Brezza's a better bat than Broady. Would be okay with Brezza batting seven actually.
(@ Spark)
Pretty sure Dhoni's was two bounces tbf.All right fair enough, he is joining the MS One Bounce Rule Dhoni's crusade to change cricket rules.
I just don't get it. I mean shouldn't performances alone matter? If/when he starts sucking, fair enough but if he's bowling so well AND taking wickets....why be so critical? It's like people saying Sehwag would never help India because he has no footwork. Yes, that has hurt him overseas but he's by far the best batsman (in terms of match winning ability) that India has. Performance = only thing that matters.Holding just hates Praveen for some reason.
They're not. The sun comes out sometimes, then batting gets easy. India could run up a big lead tomorrow if the forecast is accurate.Btw any specific reason for choosing to bowl? Because if the conditions are always like this then I don't see what sort of advantage you can gain from bowling first unlike at Lords.
It's dangerous to assume that conditions won't change - the cloud cover may not last, and the pitch should become less green once it's been out from the covers for a day or so. Plus there's the psychology of being bowled out cheaply in the first innings of the match. Dhoni might reckon that it worked well enough last time India played a test match at Trent Bridge.Btw any specific reason for choosing to bowl? Because if the conditions are always like this then I don't see what sort of advantage you can gain from bowling first unlike at Lords.