I've loved the guy since my childhoodWhy do you rate him so highly?
Who rates 2 to 5 after 1900 anyway. W.G. Grace would probably had a shot if he was not pre-1900 and mostly before test cricket.Because of Bradman, this is really a "Who rates 2-5 in test history", isn't it?
Surprised that some people aren't picking Sobers, though.
The Lame Joke Thread in OT IIRCThere's a Bradman v Tendulkar thread?
http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/cricket-chat/48516-cricketweb-hall-fame-8.html
I'm willing to revive that..
http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/cricket-chat/48516-cricketweb-hall-fame-8.html
I'm willing to revive that..
Do it.
It's weird that in the long history of cricket, with thousands and thousands of players, Bradman and Sobers are so far ahead of everyone else.It seems as if a short list should have been provided for this exercise as well. Oh well, at this point there is a run-a-way top seven and a tight race for the #5 spot. The top 2 as per usual havee seperated themselves from the rest. Btw yesterday was the 75th birthday of the Great Sir Garfield Sobers.
Need people to nominate!Do it.
If Marshall at #4 is close to Imran, then why doesn't Imran make it to the 5th position at least?Bradman
Sobers
Viv
Marshall - Imran close though
Tendulkar
Who says that's in order?If Marshall at #4 is close to Imran, then why doesn't Imran make it to the 5th position at least?
As an official vote, is it the original 5 or is Marshall in?Would probs take the current 5. Maybe Marshall in for Richards or Warne.
Where did you count Spark's vote that had Marshall/Imran??? If that was counted for Marshall then that is the difference b/w Marshall and Imran in this vote. If that was counted for Imran then he moves down from joint 4th to 5th place.Ok, Resuts, was hoping for at least 30, but voting seems to have stalled, so here we are.
Bradman -28
Sobers -25
Marshall -14
Richards -13
Imran -13
Warne -11
Tendulkar -10
Muralitharan -7
Gilchrist -4
Hadlee -4
O'Reilly -2
Surprised Warne didnt make it and the support for Imran and Marshall. Marshall for me is top 3, but glad to know I was not alone.