Please please please pick Sreesanth.So who should India go for?
Sree or Munaf given the photos which have been circulating of Sree.
I would go for Sreesanth as he is a attacking swing bowler and could be effective at TrentBridge, but interesting choice if he really is unfit.
What're the totals?In order gives a slightly fairer picture:
Trott > Tendulkar
KP < Dravid
Cook < Gambhir
Bell = Laxman
Prior > Dhoni
Strauss > Raina
Morgan > Mukund
With Trott a bit of a samplesizelol, India have the better of the top players but England the better depth. As, of course, we already knew.
yeah, he's a better and more attacking option. there will be a result at tb so not point in picking a bowler who won't do anything execpt keep the run-rate down- must pick 20 wickets!!!Please please please pick Sreesanth.
nooooooo I didn't initiate this quality comparison- effectiveness is what matters.Yeah, but it's still irrelevant. The fact that Anderson didn't swing it too much was one of the things that made him so brilliant.
Steyn's performance over there was special btw. But you came up with pissweak logic for why it was better. There's plenty of decent arguments that could be made either way, but you didn't make one
There's been no news saying Finn's in instead of Bresnan. Finn's just been added to the squad. If Tremlett doesn't play tomorrow, it look likely Bresnan comes in and Finn's 12th man but we'll find out in the morning.Pleased with the news Finn is in instead of Bresnan (that is correct right) from an Indian POV but atm if India do not win the toss I don't see us winning this match, whereas if Eng do not win the toss they still have a good shot of winning.
yea more likely to pick up wickets than bresnanWonder if Finn's 5fer this afternoon had anything to do with being called up. Hope he plays.