This.Trueman was bloody awesome tbh
Personally I think Kallis > Sobers, Lara is unarguably the second greatest batsman ever, Allan Donald easily a top 5 paceman, and Lindwall > McGrath and Lillee in any XI on the basis of he could hold a bat to greater effect than those hacks.
good grief, ikki. your standards are slipping. only 6 australians! when the cricinfo chappies did the same thing a few months ago, u had 7. better buck up, me ol' mucker! otherwise, the next time someone comes up with an exercise of this sort, u might end having a majority of non australians and, god forbid, more than 1 person from the subcontinent in the team!I missed this, but I'll make one with arguably the 3 best all-rounders.
Sutcliffe
Hobbs
Bradman
Richards (Viv)
Miller
Sobers
Gilchrist
Imran
Warne
Lillee
McGrath
Yeah ,I'll concede second place to him behind Allan Border
, Lara is unarguably the second greatest
One of the top 5 pacers of all time for mineLiking the support for Trueman.
Great team but would rather have Marshall in place of McGrath.I missed this, but I'll make one with arguably the 3 best all-rounders.
Sutcliffe
Hobbs
Bradman
Richards (Viv)
Miller
Sobers
Gilchrist
Imran
Warne
Lillee
McGrath
Massively under rated that chap TruemanOne of the top 5 pacers of all time for mine
According to Ian Chappel Sachin should have retired 4/5 years ago ,and Rohit Sharma and J.P Duminy are the next Tendulkar and LaraYes, in place of McGrath and not Lillee. According to Ian Chappell (and I think it makes sense) "Lillee could do everything that McGrath could do and at higher pace"
yup thats quite trueAccording to Ian Chappel Sachin should have retired 4/5 years ago ,and Rohit Sharma and J.P Duminy are the next Tendulkar and Lara
You missed the part where I said it made senseAccording to Ian Chappel Sachin should have retired 4/5 years ago ,and Rohit Sharma and J.P Duminy are the next Tendulkar and Lara
he picked sehwag in his 1st xi all time team.I've long since stopped reading or listening to anything that comes out of Chappelli's mouth.
It doesn't though. You don't get extra points for bowling faster if it doesn't actually result in more effective bowling, and it didn't.You missed the part where I said it made sense
Changes depending on when I'm asked Usually half the team is Australian - rightly so IMO.good grief, ikki. your standards are slipping. only 6 australians! when the cricinfo chappies did the same thing a few months ago, u had 7. better buck up, me ol' mucker! otherwise, the next time someone comes up with an exercise of this sort, u might end having a majority of non australians and, god forbid, more than 1 person from the subcontinent in the team!
According to Lillee himself, McGrath is the greatest . But I reckon Lillee is the best, myself. If I didn't pick McGrath it'd be between Donald (IMO incredibly underrated) and Marshall.Great team but would rather have Marshall in place of McGrath.
Yes, in place of McGrath and not Lillee. According to Ian Chappell (and I think it makes sense) "Lillee could do everything that McGrath could do and at higher pace"
Well, you can't really be sure of the efficacy. What if McGrath did have more pace? It's more a hypothetical - who knows how Lillee would have done in McGrath's time.It doesn't though. You don't get extra points for bowling faster if it doesn't actually result in more effective bowling, and it didn't.