Sree > Broad > Ishant IMO. Although I rate Sree a lot higher than most people.Yes.
Even if one rates Ishant as a better bowler (I don't), he's better than Sree, Larry, Curly or Moe or whoever takes the third seamer's spot.
At this moment in time he's looking absolutely terrible though, and has varied from just about acceptable to poor for a while now. Really needs to sort it out soon.Ishant is more useful than Sreesanth in Indian conditions by a margin.
Sreesanth is a lot more wayward as well and can blow hot and cold.
Broad i can't see being too good in Indian conditions either.
From the 3 as i said before in terms of average performance in all the conditions in test ,i would back Ishant.
I don't think he's looked too bad today, and I agree with you that I'd rate Ishant slightly higher of the three, although admittedly this is largely based on 2008.He always looks terrible in ODI's tbf.
Did not look as bad as usual in the IPL though this time.
Agree with this. Sreesanth always swings the ball and lands the ball on the seam pretty much all the time. That means whenever he bowls in the right areas he's going to be handful. Ishant isn't really 'blow hot'-'blow cold' like the other two. He used to be consistently good in 2008. Now he's consistently poor.Sree > Broad > Ishant IMO. Although I rate Sree a lot higher than most people.
Yeah its pretty lame.Is it just me or is there some growing animosity between some English and Indian posters? Can't wait for the series to start.
Are you in my country yet ****?Yeah its pretty lame.
!Fun Stuart Broad Fact:
Stuart Broad has more Test centuries at Lord's, the home of cricket, than Sachin Tendulkar
Sunday weekAre you in my country yet ****?