So if we lead by 320 runs with 60 overs remaining, you would hold off the declaration till we get it to six an over, despite just losing overs pretty unnecessarily ? Each to their own mate, personally I'd be looking for us to win rather than avoid defeat, just as all the top sides should do, imo.
You'd hardly lose many more overs with that equation, 57 overs with a 342 run lead is 6rpo.
Absolutely they should attack. We already have a lead of 267, which you would already expect to be enough, so we've nothing to lose by trying to move this game along at a high speed and get SL in to bat with plenty of overs left to have a real go at them.
So you think it'd be vital to score those 22 runs in the three overs ? Waste of time if you ask me, pretty confident 320 will be enough, just losing three overs is of no worth imo.
We'll be out of sight with 60 overs left, why lose 10 overs ?
I haven't actually done any calculations. I'm basically saying get a 350 lead. If they can get a 350 lead as quicker then have more than 50 overs.
Precisely, give ourselves the maximum number of overs we feel we can afford with regards the chase, in order for us to bowl them out. Has to be sixty or more for me.
