Eoin Morgan has been unexpectedly named in England's squad for the first Test against Sri Lanka at Cardiff. The strong tip had been for Ravi Bopara to earn a recall to fill the No. 6 spot vacated by Paul Collingwood
I agree and now a couple of those same jounos are talking Morgans innings down, Etheridge from The Sun, left a tweet sayingSometimes I get the impression that the media think if they go on and on enough about a player he will be selected. A lot of them thought Bopara's bowling would get him in the team as if we were going to play with 5 bowlers.
It was more the 10 and 11 batsmen he got quickly in both innings, I was referring to. It is one of those very tricky totals, of just over 200, that can end up making you look a bit silly.I wouldn't say that the tail was knocked over, they still put on nearly a hundred for the last four wickets. Tricky chase this.
I agree it'd have been nice if Morgan had played in the early season CC, but to exclude him for not doing so smacks a little of the old-fashioned "jobs for the boys" attitude that used to infect English cricket. If Eoin is the best man for the gig, not picking him for reasons other than cricketing ones would be cutting off nose to spite face stuff.I like Morgan a great deal as a batsman, was hugely disappointed he didn't commit to finding some form and time at the crease with Middlesex in some worthwhile cricket, rather than taking the cash on offer with a few games of 20-over cricket.
With Bopara turning down the IPL offers (despite initally putting himself into the auction) I did hope for these reasons he'd get the nod over Morgan. Perhaps I'm still a bit old fashioned in thinking runs and form in four-day cricket (albeit second division) eclipses anything achieved in a 20-over slog. That said, Bopara could have performed better in the CC to give the selectors a real dilemma, and Morgan's 193 for the Lions certainly strengthened his case.
I don't understand this either. There is no way they were ever going to drop Tremlett after the ashes, and Jimmy is a shoe in. I would have thought the most vulnerable would be Broad but they're not going to drop him So the bowlers just pick themselves.One thing that''s surprised me, when cricket writers and pundits have been picking the team, before Bresnan got injured they had him in before Tremlett and even now Aggers is saying it's between Finn and Tremlett for 12th man. Have I've I missed something, because I would have though the only 2 fast bowlers who were defo's for the Tests are Jimmy and Tremlett.
Agreed. Maybe the England set up under Flower doesn't brief off the record in comparison to previous regimes. Exposing all the journalists as the unknowledgeable hacks they really are.If Finn were considered more likely to play than Tremlett he wouldn't have been playing for the Lions.
Welshman?The Guardian has chipped in with this:
You heard it from the experts.