Is that supposed to be a joke or something ? .You have not seen Wasim when he came first time in Pakistani squad. His deliveries hardly come into the wickets and whenever he was able to do so, the unlucky batsman lost his wicket because none was expecting that Wasim can ever bowl a strainght ball into the wickets.
He had very poor control on his line and length in early days. This is what i mean to say.Is that supposed to be a joke or something ? .
Wasim in 1985 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odudZrsDDdw&feature=related
why would a support bowler open the bowling and bowl tons of oversImran lost his pace and sharpness because of the injuries. When he came back after his injuries he played more as a batsman. He was just a support bowler in the presence of Wasim, Waqar, Aaqib and Mushtaq.
from what i heard, only the semi-final and the final of the 1983 WC were telecasted live .... so i m eager to know that did they telecast 1983 and earlier series against Pak?There was enough to see from the India Pakistan games itself .
What are you talking we saw all Test matches live. By the way, I never EVER rate cricketers on how they perform in the limited overs game unless we are rating cricketer's for their rating ONLY in the smaller version of the game.from what i heard, only the semi-final and the final of the 1983 WC were telecasted live .... so i m eager to know that did they telecast 1983 and earlier series against Pak?
why would a support bowler open the bowling and bowl tons of overs
i am going to give you each of the first test he played from 85-90
85 - http://content-www.cricinfo.com/statsguru/engine/match/63412.html
86 - http://content-www.cricinfo.com/statsguru/engine/match/63429.html
87 - http://content-www.cricinfo.com/statsguru/engine/match/63452.html
88 - http://content-www.cricinfo.com/statsguru/engine/match/63481.html
89 - http://content-www.cricinfo.com/statsguru/engine/match/63501.html
90 - http://content-www.cricinfo.com/statsguru/engine/match/63520.html
clearly, Imran doesn't seem to agree with you that he is not one of the strike bowlers till 1990
and as I said, post 1990, i do understand that it would have been difficult on him coming back from retirement in that test series against SL
SJS this is the problem with the people who got the knowledge from either cricket magazines or websites. After reading the articles on net they think that they are more knowledgeful. I agree with you what you said. I don't comment on anything merely on the basis of my bookish knowledge. First see with your own eyes and then comment. I don't know when this internet generation will understand this reality.What are you talking we saw all Test matches live. By the way, I never EVER rate cricketers on how they perform in the limited overs game unless we are rating cricketer's for their rating ONLY in the smaller version of the game.
Well if you have never seen them, as with cricketers before your times, you do have to rely on the word of those who have. So if one reads enough, and of good writers, you are bound to form a fairly reasonable informed opinion which is still better than going by pure stats. Mind you, the writers, the good ones, if they have seen a cricketer are not going to completely ignore the actual achievements of the cricketer. So the statistics/achievements will come into it in a more objective kind of way becuse they are being considered by someone who has also, in addition, seen the cricketer.SJS this is the problem with the people who got the knowledge from either cricket magazines or websites. After reading the articles on net they think that they are more knowledgeful. I agree with you what you said. I don't comment on anything merely on the basis of my bookish knowledge. First see with your own eyes and then comment. I don't know when this internet generation will understand this reality.
^Little and bookish knowledge is sometimes so embarassing. He used to bowl mostly as first change when Wasim, Waqar and Aaqib all 3 were available. He opened the bowling only when either Aaqib or Wasim were not available. You might have read it somewhere, but i have seen the entire career of Imran with my eyes.
yep.....that's what I thought too..........Interesting.. Wasim leading the poll. I think Imran would comfortably win if you redid it now.
Not in test matchesVery close to call,but i think Wasim was the better bowler.
dude Imran has one of the most complete bowling records of all. He averages less than 30 in all countries that he has bowled in.It's closer than just a 'not in test matches' post
Agreed. Imran is the best Test bowler Pakistan ever produced. Heck, Imran has a legitimate claim to be included in the top 5 bowlers of all-time.dude Imran has one of the most complete bowling records of all. He averages less than 30 in all countries that he has bowled in.
Imran also has a better SR, Econ Rate, and averages sub 30 against all teams.
Here are the records
Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo