Yeah if any one of them is a bowler who may fill in as the 5th bowler with a roughly equal chance of taking wickets, like he has in this WC, then of course they should be ahead of Yuvraj.Woo, that is terribly impressive.
Unlike all these blokes, I suppose:
Badrinath 15 innings @111.45
Rohit Sharma 12 inings @96.00
AL Menaria 7 innings @88.50
Laxmi Shukla 7 innings @84.40
Rahane 15 innings @83.58
Sumanth 11 innings @79.00
Wasim Jaffer 15 innings @78.33
A Mukund 18 innings @75.68
Sarabjit Singh 7 innings @72.75
The premise here is not that he's the most deserving batsman after Dravid-SRT-Laxman - he is not - but that he has a shot at being the all rounder - acceptable with bat and ball, especially since Sehwag & SRT dont bowl any more. It is not a proven premise - but not disproven either. If we play Badri, say, and run Zaheer into the ground as a stock bowler - that is poor selection as well.
It isn't what Yuvi is doing with his batting - but what he's doing with his bowling lately that is the key here. (And specifically since India has been playing a non-attacking SLA like Pragyan Ojha in tests).
Last edited: