West Indies have won two of the last thirteen completed matches against Pakistan.So the West Indies would have the physiological advantage going into this match.
That may well be the case, but in 2 of their most recent meetings in big events ie the world cup and the champions trophy the Windies have won comfortably.West Indies have won two of the last thirteen completed matches against Pakistan.
Why is the Champions Trophy match played in 2004 more relevant than the Champions Trophy match played in 2009?That may well be the case, but in 2 of their most recent meetings in big events ie the world cup and the champions trophy the Windies have won comfortably.
Loses in series are one thing but the fact that the Windies have won 2 recent matches against Pak on the big stage says a lot about where the physiological balance of power lies in this match up.
Because the champions trophy in 2009 the Windies were forced to play a 3rd string team due to contract disputes.Why is the Champions Trophy match played in 2004 more relevant than the Champions Trophy match played on 2009?
Pakistan were missing a number of players in the 2007 World Cup. Why does that count?Because the champions trophy in 2009 the Windies were forced to play a 3rd string team due to contract disputes.
Missing one or two players, and having to play what at the time was a 3rd or possibly even 4th string team is a totally different state of affairs.Pakistan were missing a number of players in the 2007 World Cup. Why does that count?
I take it you have no clue about the side Pakistan fielded in that World Cup?Missing one or two players, and having to play what at the time was a 3rd or possibly even 4th string team is a totally different state of affairs.
More of a clue than you seem to have about the Windies squad in the 2009 CT!I take it you have no clue about the side Pakistan fielded in that World Cup?
I never disputed your claim though. I know the West Indies side that played in that Champions Trophy was poor. I only brought up that match because you were talking about "the big stage". I fail to understand how two matches played years and years go (matches involving Brian Lara, Inzamam-ul-Haq, Mohammad Yousuf, etc.) are relevant. It's kind of like saying West Indies are second favourites for this World Cup, because they've won more World Cups than every team bar Australia.More of a clue than you seem to have about the Windies squad in the 2009 CT!
There is a difference though between having the consistency to do i day after day and being good in a one off match up!I never disputed your claim though. I know the West Indies side that played in that Champions Trophy was poor. I only brought up that match because you were talking about "the big stage". I fail to understand how two matches played years and years go (matches involving Brian Lara, Inzamam-ul-Haq, Mohammad Yousuf, etc.) are relevant. It's kind of like saying West Indies are second favourites for this World Cup, because they've won more World Cups than every team bar Australia.
Yes WI was playing a 4th string team in 2009 and now the Pakistan team and the WI team are the same ones that faced each other in WC 2007.Missing one or two players, and having to play what at the time was a 3rd or possibly even 4th string team is a totally different state of affairs.
WI do have a chance but it is ridiculous to suggest that they hold the psychological edge because they won against Pak in 2004 and 2007. Both the teams are very different now and most of the players that played in those matches are no longer in the team.Saying West Indies are capable of winning tomorrow is different from saying they hold some sort of edge over Pakistan because of matches played in 2004 and 2007 (particularly when the recent record is very much in Pakistan's favour).
Anyway - don't think West Indies will win tomorrow. The batting's too weak.
Agree.Apparently Ajmal could play tomorrow.
Fantastic news if it happens.He's twice the bowler Rehman is,and plays with much more heart.There's also the left hander thing with WI's top order,so playing a specialist off spinner could pay dividends.
Well, yes, theoretically West Indies have a chance. Realistically speaking, they don't have much of a hope. Their batting line-up is too heavily reliant on Chris Gayle - someone who isn't exactly consistent and reliable - and Pakistan's bowling is a bit too strong. Darren Sammy - a dude who can't bowl or bat properly - is captain of the side. Enough said.WI do have a chance but it is ridiculous to suggest that they hold the psychological edge because they won against Pak in 2004 and 2007. Both the teams are very different now and most of the players that played in those matches are no longer in the team.
More Windies players in this team and 2007 compared to 2009Yes WI was playing a 4th string team in 2009 and now the Pakistan team and the WI team are the same ones that faced each other in WC 2007.
Dude Inzy was leading that Pakistan with MoYo as an important hand. We had people like Sami and Asif (IIRC) back then. The Pakistan team is very different.More Windies players in this team and 2007 compared to 2009
this was CT squad FFS
Floyd Reifer (Captain), Darren Sammy (Vice Captain), David Bernard, Tino Best, Royston Crandon, Travis Dowlin, Andre Fletcher, Nikita Miller, Daren Powell, Kieran Powell, Dale Richards, Kemar Roach, Devon Smith, Gavin Tonge, Chadwick Walton.