Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ironically, though people will criticise the gung-ho approach, the wickets have not fallen to big shots. Rather, they've been to defensive shots, or shots for ones and twos.
Surely today that has been down to poor batting rather than anything to do with the pitch. I'm sure with the right application a big and long innings is more than achievable.If we look at the highest score on this pitch for the last 3 innings, it cannot have been much more than 60 or so that Bopara got. This seems to suggest that a 'big' score or a long innings is not on the cards. Certainly all of their batsmen so far have batted with this idea in mind.
Pitch is still turning square. If you want to look at things another way, the quality of bowling has been pretty terrible, certainly worse than the game vs SA.Surely today that has been down to poor batting rather than anything to do with the pitch. I'm sure with the right application a big and long innings is more than achievable.
Just because the pitch has turned does not mean a substantial individual innings is out of the question. Personally I think a good quality batsman can score plenty of runs in one innings on this pitch against any attack. Sarwan now having to bat with the pressure of being five wickets down and little support in the batsmen to come. It may well still pay off for the WI, I don't think their tactics have helped though with regards the batting order.Pitch is still turning square. If you want to look at things another way, the quality of bowling has been pretty terrible, certainly worse than the game vs SA.
Doesn't often happen, but I agree entirely with TEC. This could easily have been my post.Dont think the 5 wickets down thing would have changed, except Sarwan would have had to bat for longer. As I said earlier, their batting order problem was compounded by their poor selection process. They effectively only bat till 4 with all rounders coming in after that. They obviously believe that Sarwan is the man to bat under pressure so whether he comes in at 80/1 or 120/4 would appear to make no difference to him, it would only mean he has less runs to chase down.
Surely giving him more time to play himself in is a better approach?Dont think the 5 wickets down thing would have changed, except Sarwan would have had to bat for longer. As I said earlier, their batting order problem was compounded by their poor selection process. They effectively only bat till 4 with all rounders coming in after that. They obviously believe that Sarwan is the man to bat under pressure so whether he comes in at 80/1 or 120/4 would appear to make no difference to him, it would only mean he has less runs to chase down.
Woud agree with that.Surely giving him more time to play himself in is a better approach?
He has about 35 overs to play himself in. Does he need more time? They clearly played to a game plan, hence Sammy, Gayle etc just went crazy on all the bowlers.Surely giving him more time to play himself in is a better approach?