Hopefully he's too busy trying to keep How off strike to notice that.Guptill-just-reached-30 alert.
Umar Gul's bowling...But then Pakistan bring in the worlds best ODI first change bowler.
How about 4(27)Meh, How's 3 off 21 isn't bothering me greatly at this stage. Big picture = NZ 45/1 in 10 after losing McCullum in the first over. Akhtar taking the pressure off How's need to take risks.
BoredCricket on Twitter said:Even when How is on strike he should be called the non-striker
...and there isn't a better first change bowler out there.Umar Gul's bowling...
And the best ODI first change bowler is...?Umar Gul's bowling...
Depends what Gul turns up today. Certainly looked ominous from a NZ POV in that over.But then Pakistan bring in the worlds best ODI first change bowler.
If batsmen are being picked on their net form then the NZ cricket team is ****ed.Honestly wouldn't be all that surprised if How was playing like a God in the nets.
Statistically there are a fair few better than Gul. Mitchell Johnson and Morne Morkel are two names which immediately spring to mind.And the best ODI first change bowler is...?
Eh,No.Also Riaz > Shoaib. Akhtar looked just about done after 1 over.
Pie chucker Razzaq into the attack.
Broad could be potentially but yeah I'd say Gul and Broad are pretty far ahead of the rest of the pack.And the best ODI first change bowler is...?
Do you really reckon they are though?Statistically there are a fair few better than Gul. Mitchell Johnson and Morne Morkel are two names which immediately spring to mind.
England use to do that. Ian Bell and Michael Vaughan were million $ net batsman when at the time they were lousy on in the case of Vaughan, finished international cricketers.If batsmen are being picked on their net form then the NZ cricket team is ****ed.
He well & truly sauced the NZ'der's in the recent NZ/Pak series. Struck almost every time in his first spell IIRC
Pie chucker Razzaq into the attack.