Ramcambrian just forgot Wasim or just hates Wasim.true....he was a good bowler but will you really select him in the top 10 of all time??? and ahead of Wasim Akram???
Fleming was a top class bowler in both formats and a cut above the person who eventually went on to replace him - Jason Gillespie who was more of a one trick pony. Could potentially have been right up there with the best if it weren't for injuries. Dont think he gets enough credit for that last over in 99 semifinal as well, would have been a flawless over if the batsman at the other end wasn't Lance KlusenerFleming was a quality ODI bowler TBF. One of the best in the world at his peak. I'd even say he was Australia's best ODI fast bowler till the '99 WC, after which McGrath really came into prominence. Still can't forget how well he bowled in that Sharjah tournament in '98.
r u saying Brian Lara qould prefer Mcgrath over Wasim?Brian Lara says hello
Sampras was hardly wayward, he was the most consistent player of his era. I'm not sure how someone who won more grand slams than anyone else in the game bar Federer is supposed to be 'wayward', let alone the fact that he lost 1 game in 8 years at wimbledon between 93 and 2000. I'd hate playing Sampras, the guy could serve aces on 2nd serve, and he could serve 4 aces from 0-40 down to win a game.McGrath was the gentlest bowler from hell you could ever encounter.
Thinking as a batsman, I doubt if there is anyone who would pick to face McGrath over Wasim, given a choice. Wasim had the wayward deliveries mixed with good ones ala Sampras. McGrath was like Federer/Nadal, in the sense that the batsman had to be on their toes from ball 1 till the last ball.
Both greats, but I would think ppl would prefer facing Sampras than Federer/Nadal.
Yesr u saying Brian Lara qould prefer Mcgrath over Wasim?
Would seem odd if he did considering that he went through an extended period where he could barely buy a run against McGrath and kept getting out in exactly the same manner.
IIRC and if he is to be believed, Lara himself stated that he found Wasim to be the most difficult bowler that he faced in his career.Would seem odd if he did considering that he went through an extended period where he could barely buy a run against McGrath and kept getting out in exactly the same manner.
zSampras was hardly wayward, he was the most consistent player of his era. I'm not sure how someone who won more grand slams than anyone else in the game bar Federer is supposed to be 'wayward', let alone the fact that he lost 1 game in 8 years at wimbledon between 93 and 2000. I'd hate playing Sampras, the guy could serve aces on 2nd serve, and he could serve 4 aces from 0-40 down to win a game.
EDIT: Think I may have misread your post, agree with your point on McGrath though.
Imran Khan thinks otherwise.With regards to the question above, my answer is Curtly Ambrose. If you ask me, indubitably the best ODI bowler I've ever seen, cant remember him ever going around the park - probably cause he didnt.
Lee, Bond, Bracken, Pollock and Vaas are all better than Gough tbh.Wasim doesn't even feature in your top 10?
He has gone around that park few times. Once against de Silva and Jayasuriya, once against Imran, and once Moin took him apart. Possibly there may be few others who as given him the charge. Possibly a SOuth African might have done it.With regards to the question above, my answer is Curtly Ambrose. If you ask me, indubitably the best ODI bowler I've ever seen, cant remember him ever going around the park - probably cause he didnt.
Pwned.
Pwned???Pwned.
I think you can add Basit Ali to this list as well.