You do need to bowl 50 overs in an ODI and Jayasuriya is quite an accomplished bowler. He also happens to have an incredible strike rate and more than serviceable average. As a complete package he definitely deserves to be talked about for a spot IMO.The only thing that could put Jayasuriya in contention is his bowling.
I totally forgot about Jayasuriya's bowling. I think he can as an all-rounder make my XI, thus replacing Jacques Kallis who was somewhat of a misfit playing at #5. Revised XI:You do need to bowl 50 overs in an ODI and Jayasuriya is quite an accomplished bowler. He also happens to have an incredible strike rate and more than serviceable average. As a complete package he definitely deserves to be talked about for a spot IMO.
This is a good team. At least better than having both Dhoni and Gilchrist in the same side.I totally forgot about Jayasuriya's bowling. I think he can as an all-rounder make my XI, thus replacing Jacques Kallis who was somewhat of a misfit playing at #5. Revised XI:
Sachin Tendulkar
Sanath Jayasuriya
Viv Richards (c)
Zaheer Abbas
Dean Jones
Michael Bevan
MS Dhoni (wk)
Wasim Akram
Joel Garner
Muttiah Muralitharan
Glenn McGrath
And dean jones in there??? Wouldn't Lara or Miandad be better options??? And I really don't know why Klusener is rated so highly by some of the posters here (especially PEWS). His bowling was nothing extraordinary and his batting was good for a few years (2-3 years max IIRC). So why Klusener in an all time XI???I totally forgot about Jayasuriya's bowling. I think he can as an all-rounder make my XI, thus replacing Jacques Kallis who was somewhat of a misfit playing at #5. Revised XI:
Sachin Tendulkar
Sanath Jayasuriya
Viv Richards (c)
Zaheer Abbas
Dean Jones
Michael Bevan
MS Dhoni (wk)
Wasim Akram
Joel Garner
Muttiah Muralitharan
Glenn McGrath
Respect your choice(it's a very good all time ODI XI, IMO), but am not comfortable with the idea of leaving 10/50 overs to part timers in an all XI.As I've said in this thread before, I'm not comfortably with Kapil Dev batting #7 in an all-time world team given his batting record. He wasn't good enough to bat there at this level IMO. I'm more comfortable with Klusener, Richards and maybe Symonds if I pick him sharing the fifth bowling role than I am with Kapil batting seven.
Any one of Jones, Miandada or de Silva are exchangeable. But i'd drop Jones and bring in Klusener at #7 and push the rest up one place.And dean jones in there??? Wouldn't Lara or Miandad be better options??? And I really don't know why Klusener is rated so highly by some of the posters here (especially PEWS). His bowling was nothing extraordinary and his batting was good for a few years (2-3 years max IIRC). So why Klusener in an all time XI???
I agree. Kapil brings in so much with the ball and a more than handy bat.Respect your choice(it's a very good all time ODI XI, IMO), but am not comfortable with the idea of leaving 10/50 overs to part timers in an all XI.
If something goes wrong these guys will still continue to be hit for 70 runs in 10 overs, not to mention the trickle down effect on other bowlers. With a stronger bowling line up you would always have a chance of coming back into the game.
I am really not convinced about Klusener. Why is he being rated so highly here???? As I said earlier did he have anything significant going for him before or after that 2-3 year golden period. If we just want to take bowling peaks then Waqar as an ODI bowler was just phenomenal.Any one of Jones, Miandada or de Silva are exchangeable. But i'd drop Jones and bring in Klusener at #7 and push the rest up one place.
His record speaks for itself tbhI agree. Kapil brings in so much with the ball and a more than handy bat.
I am really not convinced about Klusener. Why is he being rated so highly here???? As I said earlier did he have anything significant going for him before or after that 2-3 year golden period. If we just want to take bowling peaks then Waqar as an ODI bowler was just phenomenal.
Yeah, indeed it does. Has batted only 19 times at number 7 in his career to average 31 at a SR of 86.His record speaks for itself tbh
Lance Klusener | South Africa Cricket | Cricket Players and Officials | ESPN Cricinfo