No they haven'tengland must bat on and on and on and on... 2-1 and 3-1 scoreline aren't that different considering both objectives have been achieved, to win a test series and retain the Ashes...
What? Which part?No they haven't
Well there's more than 2 days of cricket left in this test match, in which we need a draw or a win to win the test series.What? Which part?
I feel I may have understood your comment when looking back. I will now blame a lack of sleepWhat? Which part?
He should be under pressure for his spot now, losing form as a specialist fielder.I'm surprised Smith hasn't caught that. Had it - then didn't.
ffs 'misunderstood'I feel I may have understood your comment when looking back. I will now blame a lack of sleep
I think you misread my post. I was implying England if they bat on and on will have the test drawn. They need not push at all for a win in this test even from the dominant position they are in now, except for bragging rights of a 3-1 demolition job. They need not make "adventourous" declarations at any cost.Well there's more than 2 days of cricket left in this test match, in which we need a draw or a win to win the test series.
Yep I tried to backtrack ^^^I think you misread my post. I was implying England if they bat on and on will have the test drawn. They need not push at all for a win in this test even from the dominant position they are in now, except for bragging rights of a 3-1 demolition job. They need not make "adventourous" declarations at any cost.
You'll get there eventuallyffs 'misunderstood'
CheersYep I tried to backtrack ^^^
I feel I may have understood your comment when looking back. I will now blame a lack of sleep
ffs 'misunderstood'