• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Is it too early to declare Dale Steyn as an all-time great?

Champ

Cricket Spectator
He's a special bowler.Has done well in most conditions.Got the best ever strike rate.Lot of people feel a bowler has to take something like 350+ to be considered as an ATG.I'd rather look at the quality than quantity & rate him as an ATG.
 

pskov

International 12th Man
How many bowlers in history have been unquestionably the best bowler in the world for three years and are not considered an all time great?
 

pskov

International 12th Man
That depends on the quality of your peers; no ?
Yes of course, but it was a genuine question. Is there anyone who was generally considered the best bowler in the world for a reasonable length of time that looking back we wouldn't call an all-time great today?
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
You know a fast bowler is knocking on the cusp of being an all time great player when as a fan who supports the other team, your hope is that he is restricted to "only" a few wickets up front. When you want to close your eyes when he is steaming in and you're in a spot of bother, and you can't tell where the next partnership is coming. When your hope is that your team can score a few runs before getting that inevitable unplayable delivery.

Steyn is close to all of those. So yes, I would put him there.
 

Black_Warrior

Cricketer Of The Year
You know a fast bowler is knocking on the cusp of being an all time great player when as a fan who supports the other team, your hope is that he is restricted to "only" a few wickets up front. When you want to close your eyes when he is steaming in and you're in a spot of bother, and you can't tell where the next partnership is coming. When your hope is that your team can score a few runs before getting that inevitable unplayable delivery.

Steyn is close to all of those. So yes, I would put him there.
I will say what I had said in the Waqar-Steyn thread.. Part of greatness if longevity. Federer is such a great player not because he dominates all the time but his ability to come back after being down. Throughout a career, you go through various highs and lows, best form, peak, best fitness, best pace, injuries, poor fitness, bad form, low pace, low confidence, fighting for your place, dropped, trying to make a comeback etc.Right now Steyn, as awesome as he is has not had the decline yet, the major injury yet, the major dip in fitness/pace yet. Every fast bowler goes through that and Steyn will as well. I am also sure that he has the ability to come back after that injury and be a strike bowler. But I will wait for him to do that before I classify him as a great. Right now, he is just awesome, beyond awesome.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
A few things stick out from his record that make him remarkable. The first is his strikerate which is far ahead of any bowler aside from Waqar in the modern era (and Waqar's is not that exceptional when you remove Bangladesh and Zimbabwe).
I don't recall Waqar playing too many tests against Bangladesh.............
 

Days of Grace

International Captain
Dale Styen is the best fast bowler I have seen in a long time, barring Shane Bond, who was never on the park enough anyway.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
Dale Styen is the best fast bowler I have seen in a long time, barring Shane Bond, who was never on the park enough anyway.
Bond was pretty good, so was the match-fixer (Asif). The guy had phenomenal talent. Could have been a McGrath type bowler with the swinging ability of Wasim Akram....sigh
 

smash84

The Tiger King

Black_Warrior

Cricketer Of The Year
But he killed Zimbabwe. He was the captain at that time and took 10fers regularly against them.
But that Zimbabwe side of 2002 was pretty good.. They might even be better than current WI, New Zealand and Pakistan test sides.. and we dont discount Steyn's record against these three sides now.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
But that Zimbabwe side of 2002 was pretty good.. They might even be better than current WI, New Zealand and Pakistan test sides.. and we dont discount Steyn's record against these three sides now.
Anything against Zimbabwe is usually discounted (quite rightly so IMO). But you might have a point that WI of today is almost as bad (if not worse than the Zim of that time)
 

Black_Warrior

Cricketer Of The Year
I see...

Well thats problematifc..because I am pretty confident the Zimbabwe of 2002 with Andy Flower, Grant Flower, Blignaut, Carlisle, Goodwin would beat current WI, Pakistan and New Zealand..at least at home.
 

Teja.

Global Moderator
I see...

Well thats problematifc..because I am pretty confident the Zimbabwe of 2002 with Andy Flower, Grant Flower, Blignaut, Carlisle, Goodwin would beat current WI, Pakistan and New Zealand..at least at home.
Heath Streak was so so good.
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Zimbabwe was ceratinly non-minnow for almost 10 years...

Minnow is something outright pathetic, that usually gets test status by mistake, and almost never threatens to even draw a test match against a non-minnow.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
Zimbabwe was ceratinly non-minnow for almost 10 years...

Minnow is something outright pathetic, that usually gets test status by mistake, and almost never threatens to even draw a test match against a non-minnow.
yes and Zim has been the definition of minnowness other than that 10 year period.
 

Top