Haha @ that comparison given he's yet to bowl a wide in his 6 overs so far. Granted he been slightly lacking in the accuracy stakes, but you're assessment of him is a tad premature isn't it?Yeah, that's why I only said he's "rubbish atm". He's 145-150, clueless and not accurate, which means he's right up there with your Daren Powells and Mohammed Samis.
Definitely a prospect but that's really not saying much imo. Being fast with the potential to bowl faster is a long, long way from being potentially a good international bowler.
He's always been pretty bad in limited overs cricket. He's played some good innings when in peak form but he's always been a bit over-rated in it due to his Test exploits.Every time I've seen Younis Khan bat in a limited overs match in the last 18 months he has been hopeless
Was getting decent movement off the seam, tbf. And he might be quicker than Aamer by a fair margin. But overall Aamer was better by some distance, yes.Milne doesn't get as much movement. Needs Bond to teach him about that as well.
Pakistan need to get a move on here. These two batsman are losing the game.
Jinxed...Haha @ that comparison given he's yet to bowl a wide in his 6 overs so far. Granted he been slightly lacking in the accuracy stakes, but you're assessment of him is a tad premature isn't it?
hehe, epic wideHaha @ that comparison given he's yet to bowl a wide in his 6 overs so far. Granted he been slightly lacking in the accuracy stakes, but you're assessment of him is a tad premature isn't it?
best jinxHaha @ that comparison given he's yet to bowl a wide in his 6 overs so far. Granted he been slightly lacking in the accuracy stakes, but you're assessment of him is a tad premature isn't it?
And another one.best jinx
Premature? Is it not premature to be excited by a bowler who has thus far been completely ineffective?Haha @ that comparison given he's yet to bowl a wide in his 6 overs so far. Granted he been slightly lacking in the accuracy stakes, but you're assessment of him is a tad premature isn't it?
JinxHaha @ that comparison given he's yet to bowl a wide in his 6 overs so far. Granted he been slightly lacking in the accuracy stakes, but you're assessment of him is a tad premature isn't it?
Well, if you think he's promising & you're not disputing his raw pace, what are you arguing about?I think he's promising too, but there's a big difference between being a "promising fast bowler" and a "bowler with the potential to bowl fast".
TH in deliberately being different shocker.Well, if you think he's promising & you're not disputing his raw pace, what are you arguing about?
Well, if you think he's promising & you're not disputing his raw pace, what are you arguing about?
TH in judging players on how well they do shockerTH in deliberately being different shocker.