Debris
International 12th Man
This is a crap excuse. If he can be bribed to bowl worse, this clearly counts against him as said aboveAkram is believed to be bribed in instances to under perform.
This is a crap excuse. If he can be bribed to bowl worse, this clearly counts against him as said aboveAkram is believed to be bribed in instances to under perform.
I agree. But who is this Joel Garner guy?Shaun Pollock, the world's most underrated one-day cricketer.
Arguably the finest ODI bowler ever.I agree. But who is this Joel Garner guy?
U cant be serious?I agree. But who is this Joel Garner guy?
How is that a point in favour of Wasim Akram ?Akram had ****tiest fielding team. Many drop catches. Imagine Akram's ability in Aussie team. Man, he wouldn't have to bowl stump to stump so many times any more.
Akram is believed to be bribed in instances to under perform.
No. As big a fan i am of McGrath, i just dont agree to this. Played most of his cricket on helpful tracks.McGrath is the greatest ODI bowler of all time.
He was in by far the most batsman friendly era of ODI cricket, and yet his stats stand up to the best.
He is by far, unquestionably the most successful bowler in world cups and won Man of the Series in 2007.
All of this talk about talent means nothing next to the ability to both keep the runs low and take wickets (not taking anything away from any of the other bowlers here, just saying that aesthetics shouldn't be the primary method of judging a player).
Wasim made his debut pre-1984. So in your book is he a post-1990 bowler or pre????Of the post-1990 bowlers, McGrath for me.
I would agree with you here. Wasim played his ODI cricket where average ODI scores were much higher than elsewhere. In Australia average ODI scores are probably lower than in Pakistan. The new ball doesn't bounce much either. The fact that whenever Wasim has bowled in ODIs in Australia he has bowled outstandingly well. 1992 world cup, C&U World Series 1996-97, Aus, Ind, and Pak series in 1999.No. As big a fan i am of McGrath, i just dont agree to this. Played most of his cricket on helpful tracks.
Wasim was a pretty average bowler with incredible potential until 1990, so yeah, post 1990.Wasim made his debut pre-1984. So in your book is he a post-1990 bowler or pre????
Tssst. Fanboy.I agree. But who is this Joel Garner guy?
who would say ruud van nistelrooy is a better striker than the brazillian ronaldo - on goal scoring you have a pretty strong case
now, who would say van nistlrooy was a better PLAYER than the brazillian ronaldo? - hardly no one.
the argument of mcgrath being as or anywhere near as skillful as akram is similar to the above.
it may in fact be a total red herring because at the end of the day all you care about is wickets and mcgrath was a better wicket taker, but overall not as brilliant as akram, who like ronaldo had more facets to his game, had more ability, had more skillz and was capable of the outrageously brilliant in a way mcgrath could only dream of
what differentiated mcgrath was his professionalism and longevity which i think only akram can dream of!
we are much more liekly to see a player like mcgrath in the future then we are akram, thats why akram is so unique.
Tssst. Fanboy.
Wat?No. As big a fan i am of McGrath, i just dont agree to this. Played most of his cricket on helpful tracks.
oooooooooooh oooooooooooh ooooooooooohGavin Larsen
an economy of 3.76 from 120+ matches. Not bad at all. What say!oooooooooooh oooooooooooh oooooooooooh
Gavin Larsen.
Of course.Wat?
Larsen and Harris were fantastic together. Made life tough for stroke makers.Yeah he was an outstanding ODI bowler tbh.