Prince EWS
Global Moderator
DWTA. He's ****.Bennett's not terrible with the bat actually.
DWTA. He's ****.Bennett's not terrible with the bat actually.
I hardly think Bennett is as bad as you're making out. Looks okay for a #10 to me. Let's not forget that classic England tail of Caddick-Mullally-Giddins-Tufnell (if I remember rightly). Bennett looks better than Mullally and definitely better than Giddens or Tufnell. Even looks less unco than Iain O'Brien.Martin and Bennett both off the mark!
O'Brien had balls though.I hardly think Bennett is as bad as you're making out. Looks okay for a #10 to me. Let's not forget that classic England tail of Caddick-Mullally-Giddins-Tufnell (if I remember rightly). Bennett looks better than Mullally and definitely better than Giddens or Tufnell. Even looks less unco than Iain O'Brien.
Problem with this partnership is that extras has more than the two batsmen combined10 run partnership, both should raise the bat.
10 run partnership, both should raise the bat.
11 run partnership now.No one here would have predicted that many.
DWTA.... You're ****.DWTA. He's ****.
he has got 90 runs in his 57 match careerAccording to Cricinfo, Chris Martin has hit 13 4s in his career
I think only one of them was on purposeAccording to Cricinfo, Chris Martin has hit 13 4s in his career
Lies! He masterfully angles them through the slips. One of the all-time great players of that particular shot.I think only one of them was on purpose
Wasn't as good as Mark Gillespie at the french cut.Lies! He masterfully angles them through the slips. One of the all-time great players of that particular shot.