Not sure how they were the best team in the first game by a long long long way? Australia didn't bowl well to one partnership and that's it.Well done Sri Lanka. Great landmark to achieve. The better team in the two games by a long long long way.
DWTA.Drastic times call for drastic measures. My Ashes line up for the Gabba:
1. Watson
2. Katich (if injured, Hughes)
3. Ponting
4. Clarke
5. Khawaja
6. Smith
7. Haddin
8. Johnson
9. Hilfenhaus
10. Copeland
11. Bollinger
Yeah it doesn't make your mood good for the Ashes coming up either. So many losses make you feel somewhat disinterested - hardly makes you feel pumped up for the series.Sigh. Get so moody when Australia lose. And now I'm annoyed all the time!
I just feeling ****ing annoyed!Yeah it doesn't make your mood good for the Ashes coming up either. So many losses make you feel somewhat disinterested - hardly makes you feel pumped up for the series.
I'd prefer 4 quicks. Don't think there is much need for a spinner at the Gabba. Plus I think Hauritz is mediocre (yet again proved so this ODI). Other than that I like your list, but its still a touch too conservative for my liking.DWTA.
Yeh but you have to admit you'd feel more pumped if we hadn't had 7 (maybe 8) straight losses coming into it.I just feeling ****ing annoyed!
Still pumped for the ashes though. Such dumb scheduling by CA. No idea why this series is even on now.
Not really, The recent series are meaningless to me, still am pumped up as ever before.Yeh but you have to admit you'd feel more pumped if we hadn't had 7 (maybe 8) straight losses coming into it.
There has been a LOT of rain up here in Brisbane recently, but still, I am loathe to not have any legitimate spin options, particularly with Watson in the side.I'd prefer 4 quicks. Don't think there is much need for a spinner at the Gabba. Plus I think Hauritz is mediocre (yet again proved so this ODI). Other than that I like your list, but its still a touch too conservative for my liking.
After so many losses, I feel the time is ripe for a new era of Aus cricket.
Doesn't mean we will start winning all of a sudden by selecting young players.After so many losses, I feel the time is ripe for a new era of Aus cricket.
But seriously Hussey has been in poor, poor form for so long now (3 years for gods sake!). I'd love for him to bounce back one more time, but I just can't see it happening. He has to go, and soon.There has been a LOT of rain up here in Brisbane recently, but still, I am loathe to not have any legitimate spin options, particularly with Watson in the side.
Dropping two batsmen is tough on the team. You can still drop Hussey if he fails in the first two tests. Despite his recent hundred, I feel that North really has to go. He's not a young prospect, has a very mediocre record after a lot of tests and really is just stopping a player like Smith or Khawaja from getting vital experience early in their careers.
What makes you think we are going to win by keeping players who have consistenly lost games for us? We have tried this approach for years now, and it has failed time and time again.Doesn't mean we will start winning all of a sudden by selecting young players.
It's a fairly bull**** article mate. Unfortunately it seems representative.Bull****, Hauritz gets over $1 million a year?
Reliance Mobile ICC Rankings, ICC ODI Team Rankings, ICC Rankings PredictorWill be interesting to see how this series impacts the ODI rankings. I would imagine Sri Lanka has a chance of going to no.1.
Yeh it sounds like trash to me.It's a fairly bull**** article mate. Unfortunately it seems representative.