Julian87
State Captain
The only way george will be ahead of either is if neither are fit. Not only are the other 2 much better bowlers at this point, but considering their only real chance of playing in a full strength team is ahead of Hauritz, both are much, much better with the bat than George considering they'd probably have to bat number 9.Ryan Harris on comeback trail | Fox Sports
That's the latest article I read mate. Seems he reinjured himself last month, but he's still aiming for the first Test, maybe the 3rd. But I imagine that the selectors wouldn't be too keen to throw him back in straight away after an injury. He's not first choice anyway. He'll have to prove himself in state cricket like Siddle.
This part was a bit discouraging:
"I hate mentioning it, but Alex and I have spoken about it, just playing limited overs.
"It is an option if things get to that but I will cross that bridge when I get to it."
Another quick bowler who can't handle the longer format?
I think George is still ahead of Siddle and Harris right now.
Honestly think it was Clark's first innings bowling that won us this game:The reason Clark was dropped is because the pace of his SA 05 - WI 08 peak was gone when he was seen in the Ashes last summer. To the pace of Pollock & Chaminda Vaas " the flag end of their test careers. Which reduces his efffectiveness @ to only a super greentop & given pitches are so flat these days. He would useless most of the time.
4th Test: England v Australia at Leeds, Aug 7-9, 2009 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com
Siddle received the accolades but Clark bowled better, and despite getting some stick in the second dig, it was the first innings that decided the game considering Australia had an innings in hand. And that's not even mentioning that of Siddle's 5-fa 3 were genuine tailenders and the ball was seaming.
Last edited: