Test Team World Rankings

[taipan1]

When was the last time you toured SL then?

Well SA has "toured" India twice since India has been here.

 

[taipan1]

Boring ****, I am out.

Cheers

 

[aussie]

Yes i'm out too as well. Just will end by repeating this again: http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/2346223-post125.html

All i know is 10, 20, 50 years from now no one will ever remember this so called # 1 period from IND, by whatever margin you or others wish to claim they are.

Also if next year if India lose in SA, WI, ENG. Then last 3 years of results which has propelled them to # 1 based on the ranking system. Wil fall flat on its face.

 

[taipan1]

Well SA has "toured" India twice since India has been here.

Actually since the last time India ventured to SA, we have toured Eng, Aus, Ind(2), WI, Pak(2) and Bangladesh.

 

[vcs]

Actually since the last time India ventured to SA, we have toured Eng, Aus, Ind(2), WI, Pak(2) and Bangladesh.

Just a couple months to go then, I'm sure you can wait a bit longer.

 

[taipan1]

Just a couple months to go then, I'm sure you can wait a bit longer.

Yeah, always nice to have an easy home series.

 

[Teja.]

Yeah, always nice to have an easy home series.

Hope you stick around during the series.

 

[Jono]

Yeah, always nice to have an easy home series.

After failing to beat Australia and England, you definitely need it.

 

[vcs]

After failing to beat Australia and England at home in a decade, you definitely need it.

Fixed.

 

[taipan1]

After failing to beat Australia and England, you definitely need it.

Exactly my point, even though the English were extremely lucky last year.

 

[taipan1]

Fixed.

Noice, India are 1/13 in SA aren't they?

 

[Jono]

They were lucky because South Africa couldn't bowl out tailenders.

Beware Ishant Sharma's batting this series I think

 

[Teja.]

I predict a tenfold increase in the ASS(Appreciate Sreesanth Society) by the end of the SA tour tbh.

 

[vcs]

Noice, India are 1/13 in SA aren't they?

Yep, pretty much like SA are against Australia at home.

 

[taipan1]

They were lucky because South Africa couldn't bowl out tailenders.

Not disputing that, but most cricket watchers would agree SA were by far the superior team.

 

[taipan1]

Yep, pretty much like SA are against Australia at home.

Excepting whitewashes?

 

[vcs]

Excepting whitewashes?

Nah, atleast we win the occasional live Test in the series.

 

[aussie]

Not disputing that, but most cricket watchers would agree SA were by far the superior team.

Yep. Losing Steyn & Kallis bowling to injuries in that series affected them.

 

[taipan1]

Nah, atleast we win the occasional live Test in the series.

Obviously you won;t know much about Aus in SA.

 

[aussie]

Fixed.

No shame in not being able to beat AUS.

But injuries to key players prevented SA from beating ENG last winter. They were clealry the superior team in that series.

While when ENG beat SA @ home in 2004/05. SA where in transition mode, while ENG were the better team.