Yeah - bravo. Relying on the same press who were still bigging him up when he cost Canterbury the game against Taranaki:
Sonny Bill Williams a sure All Blacks bet | Stuff.co.nz
And when he nearly cost them the game against Northland:
Sonny Bill Williams keeps getting better | Stuff.co.nz
The summary of the Northland game is even more incredible that SBW himself didn't rate his game, yet the press didn't even mention his mistakes. However, they do try and pass off all three tries in that game as being created by him when in at least two of the three (as I recall) he was only one of the cogs in well worked team moves.
Those articles use words like 'ubiquitous' and 'league style' for his offloads. Sure, sometimes those moves pay off - and maybe players in the ITM Cup aren't the best for reading some of these little bits of trickery that SBW has but the next time one of these tricks gifts an intercept try to some opposition, do you want it to be in an All Blacks jersey? Would we be talking about selecting him if he was a previously unheard of player taking up Union with these performances? I suspect the concensus would be towards seeing how he performs at Super 15 level.
Look, I'm happy to concede that he's improved as the season's gone on, but only a month ago Rob Penney dropped him to the bench and yet the NZ press criticised the decision, despite it having done him quite a bit of good in hindsight. The guy hasn't been tested against top quality opposition (let's see how his defense holds up against Super 15 sides, maybe) yet has still shown frailties and the fact he's lacking some technique and experience in Union.
Fruean should be ahead of Williams. I have no doubt that Williams has been getting some of the credit for some of Fruean's play. I forget which match it was, but Fruean set up Williams to finish under the posts with a line break, yet the press the next day was all about how Williams scored the decisive try when that try was all down to the line breaking prowess and superb passing of Fruean.