Personally think Mitch is just one of those personalities trying to make everyone happy. Even when he was blowing everyone away, people/press here were saying "Wow, just think of how good he'll be when he gets his in-swinger going properly!" In chasing absolutely everyone's approval, he's bowling arse. On top of just being a bit of a rhythm bowler anyway, as I said earlier, he's bowled his best spells when he's just concentrated on bowling naturally and letting the movement take care of itself. Lee was in a similar category, "Yeah what a spell but you can't be a great without an out-swinger" and such bollocks.Compare it to the video of his 7fer against them earlier that Aussie summer- his arm comes down much, much straighter. The point where I disagree with TEC is that he can still be a good bowler with a low arm, and that 7fer is a good example of him bowling very well. But in South Africa he briefly touched the realms of superhuman. None of the pace was gone- if anything he was bowling faster than ever- and he had excellent control of line, much better than he ever manages bowling with a low arm. And of course, he swings it. That makes a huge, huge difference, even when it isn't the swinging deliveries that get the wickets. You can say he doesn't need the inswinger to be effective, but it certainly makes him a much better bowler when he can swerve the ball towards the stumps at the last minute bowling 150Ks. I say "one of the best", but really it's the single best bowling spell I've ever seen.
The point is that I don't see him reproducing that again, or at least, not often enough that we can consider it when thinking of his current quality as a bowler. Headingley was the closest he's come but in truth that spell didn't even come close. There are two Midge Johnsons as far as I'm concerned- the quality bowler that comes on first change for Australia and the all-time great that bowled for two tests in South Africa last Spring. And I don't think the former is the third best bowler in the world at the moment.
Some truth in that, I suspect. He doesn't strike me as being cut from the same cloth as some Aussie seamers of yore, personality-wise. Seems a more diffident soul,eager to please and needing approval; I couldn't imagine Thomson or Hughes for instance giving that much of a public toss if their mothers and partners weren't bosom buddies.Personally think Mitch is just one of those personalities trying to make everyone happy. Even when he was blowing everyone away, people/press here were saying "Wow, just think of how good he'll be when he gets his in-swinger going properly!" In chasing absolutely everyone's approval, he's bowling arse. On top of just being a bit of a rhythm bowler anyway, as I said earlier, he's bowled his best spells when he's just concentrated on bowling naturally and letting the movement take care of itself. Lee was in a similar category, "Yeah what a spell but you can't be a great without an out-swinger" and such bollocks.
Mind you, the ability to filter out that which doesn't matter is what separates a great from blokes with potential too. Glenn McGrath started the 94/95 Ashes series trying to bowl out-swingers because he believed those who said you couldn't be great without it. Bowled arse, was dropped, came back for Perth, bowled hostile seamers and wrecked them. By the end of the next series he played in the WI, was the Aussies' best pacer, within two years he was challenging for the best in the world and another two years after, was heading towards being an all-time great.
And then he eventually developed an out-swinger anyway. But the point is he did well without it and developed it on his own terms.
How many matches has he even playedAsif seems to be picking up fivers for fun.7 fivers in 20 matches...just incredible.
??? Didn't get you.How many matches has he even played
It says so in the first you quoted...How many matches has he even played
Suppose I'd agree with that. Could easily go with Bollinger ahead of Zaheer or Johnson on another day though. I still think it's too early to put Aamer in this sort of class anyway, even if he was part of the discussion.Assuming Asif and Aamer are out for a while/for good, what would your picks be now?
For me,
Steyn
Zaheer
Mitch
Zaheer, Steyn are good picks...but i would pick Broad (even though i don't really like him) ahead of Anderson.As a matter of interest, the officially ICC rankings have the fast bowlers as follows:
1. Dale Steyn
2. Mohammad Asif
3. Zaheer Khan
4. James Anderson
5. Morne Morkel
6. Mitchell Johnson
7. Doug Bollinger
8. Mohammad Aamer
9. Stuart Broad
10. Makhaya Ntini
11. Jerome Taylor
12. Umar Gul
13. Peter Siddle
14. Ben Hilfenhaus
15. Jacques Kallis
So they'd answer your question as Steyn, Zaheer and Anderson. Which is interesting because they're definitely the best three exponents of swing bowling going around at the moment.
If the 2 A's are ever back again....If i picked a world XI. Steyn, Asif, Bollinger should be the 3 quicks picked in most conditons. But i'd replace Asif with either Aamir or Zaheer if the pitch is flat.
Apart from in England as Bollinger can't hit the right strip over here.If i picked a world XI. Steyn, Asif, Bollinger should be the 3 quicks picked in most conditons. But i'd replace Asif with either Aamir or Zaheer if the pitch is flat.
Yeah I definitely wouldn't go near Bollinger or Johnson in England. Steyn, Zaheer and Anderson for me, there.Apart from in England as Bollinger can't hit the right strip over here.
Nah just pick Sreesanth, Boucher and nine batsmen.Steyn, Sreesanth and Johnson for me, in SA.
I'd go with that.If i picked a world XI. Steyn, Asif, Bollinger should be the 3 quicks picked in most conditons. But i'd replace Asif with either Aamir or Zaheer if the pitch is flat.
Yea a world test XI ATM:I'd go with that.