dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Are you ********? What about those millions of people who, you know, follow and enjoy baseball?No one really knows right now too much on them right now,
Are you ********? What about those millions of people who, you know, follow and enjoy baseball?No one really knows right now too much on them right now,
About how they plan to run the club, obviously.Are you ********? What about those millions of people who, you know, follow and enjoy baseball?
I clearly stated ENG should forget about using target men as a starting option, not totally. They should be reduced to being last resort sub options.Yet you were calling for Carroll to be picked...
Yes, because clearly Davies has been picked to startI clearly stated ENG should forget about using target men as a starting option, not totally. They should be reduced to being last resort sub options.
Wait stop. Your defending Davies selection now?. I could have sworn this post of yours a few pages ago, was showing distgust @ his selection along with most other posters:Yes, because clearly Davies has been picked to start
He's obviously been picked as the best option in the specific role that he can play if required.
As such he's head and shoulders above Andy Carroll (who it probably escaped your notice since you thought Steve Harper was fit but was left out by Newcastle this weekend with Shola Ameobi ahead of him)
Anyway. No Crouch is already in as the target-man so a second one in Davies isn't needed. The 4 strikers that should have been picked are Rooney, Bent, Crouch, Owen/Caroll (in which i would have picked Owen).Kevin ****ing Davies.
Downing's actually been playing though and not been rubbish.No, if there's one player who wouldn't have been better, it's Downing (aside from comparing a left winger with a right winger that is)
I would've been interested in seeing what happened if Fabio had called up the Germany U21 captain personally - he's apparently a winger and is tearing up the Bundesliga.
Downing has always been rubbish for ENG though. ENG have seen enough of him on the international stage to know he is not up to it.Downing's actually been playing though and not been rubbish.
Unless you're Uppercut.
Presume you've not seen him playing then.Downing's actually been playing though and not been rubbish.
Haha I support Glentoran!Unless you're Uppercut.
My bad Thought you were of the opinion that all NI clubs were filled with sectarian scum.Haha I support Glentoran!
There's a difference between thinking Davies shouldn't be picked, and recognising that he is the best person to do a specific job should the manager decide to play in a certain formation/style.Wait stop. Your defending Davies selection now?. I could have sworn this post of yours a few pages ago, was showing distgust @ his selection along with most other posters:
http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/2334057-post2466.html
And as i said with Crouch already in, i dont see the need for a second target man in the squad, who can play in the same 4-5-1/4-4-1-1 formation, which he done many times for ENG in the past (although ENG should refrain from playing such formations). So its a poor selection by Capello on both a tactical & merit grounds.There's a difference between thinking Davies shouldn't be picked, and recognising that he is the best person to do a specific job should the manager decide to play in a certain formation/style.
If England want to play a 4-5-1 with the "1" being an old fashioned target man, I'd argue that Kevin Davies is the best player available for the job. That's not the same as arguing that his selection is a good one.