• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Sri Lanka Tri-Series

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
The Indian bottom five is dreadful. You can't call this an international standard bottom five! Just too soft. Why can't they pick bowlers who can score enough runs? We keep picking on the top six each time they've failed, but the bottom five has failed all the time, and they're getting worse each time- now both Praveen and Jadeja are weak links in the batting.

Every other team bats deep, with bowlers capable of scoring enough runs to save them when the top six is out. India, on the other hand, have virtually nobody- just average tailenders at seven and eight, and nobody below. That's been the cause of many a low score they've been bowled out for, and an area of weakness. This should be thought about by the selectors sooner than later, as the top six can't keep winning for them all the time. There are options aplenty, at least four to choose, but the selectors look otherwise all the time.

The New Zealand team's fielding has earned the team a lot of wickets, with a few blinders scalping some of India's top batsmen. That's more food for thought for the Indian selectors, who seem to pick geriatrics like Munaf, Ojha and Praveen Kumar time and again.
 

Himannv

Hall of Fame Member
This tri series has been like Sehwag vs Sri Lanka and Sehwag vs New Zealand. Its like if he doesn't score they get bundled out for low scores. The rest of them are going down like dominoes.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
This tri series has been like Sehwag vs Sri Lanka and Sehwag vs New Zealand. Its like if he doesn't score they get bundled out for low scores. The rest of them are going down like dominoes.
Sehwag: 240
Haha yeah the Indian XI (only counting those in this match) this series without Sehwag: 269
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
For the Indians, Ishant Sharma may still be useful in ODIs. He's got a rather useful strike rate a little over 32 (before this game) and in the last ten games, he's been striking at just a little over 30. He'll get wickets regularly, as against one in 40 for Praveen and Munaf and spinner Ojha, or one in 52 for Jadeja. If he can sort out that excessive economy rate, he can hold his place in the team and do well for them for some time.
 

Himannv

Hall of Fame Member
Scorecards:

1st Match: India v New Zealand at Dambulla, Aug 10, 2010 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com

3rd Match: Sri Lanka v India at Dambulla, Aug 16, 2010 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com

5th Match: Sri Lanka v India at Dambulla, Aug 22, 2010 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com

Sehwag seems to be doing all the work here while the rest of them have never crossed 40 and are usually operating in single digits. The trend is continuing today as well. Sehwag is carrying them at the moment IMO.
 

Matt79

Hall of Fame Member
That's more food for thought for the Indian selectors, who seem to pick geriatrics like Munaf, Ojha and Praveen Kumar time and again.
:(. Remember you having your little comment on Praveen Kumar in your sig for the longest time. Sad to see that you feel he hasn't delivered. (as in genuinely sad, not criticizing you for 'changing your mind').
 

BeeGee

International Captain
Guptill fails again. You'd think an opening batsman would be able to keep out a dead straight delivery, wouldn't you?
 

Himannv

Hall of Fame Member
:(. Remember you having your little comment on Praveen Kumar in your sig for the longest time. Sad to see that you feel he hasn't delivered. (as in genuinely sad, not criticizing you for 'changing your mind').
IMO he's quite a good bowler. Perhaps if he was a bit quicker he would be a fantastic player.
 

Top