The question is though, why would players from the Australian side not be going out partying? From all accounts, Ponting is a very good leader of men and has the whole team behind him. You're not going to go out partying and piss off a captain if he's got your respect, something which Ponting does seem to have from the players in his team. Perhaps the same can't be said of others.But you gotta admit leading the INdian side of the late 90s and the Windies side of the last two decades IS a LOT more than leading THAT Aussie side.. I mean, do you seriously think any of the Aussies would have out partying after being 46 all out in a home test??????
I don't know man. To the best of my knowledge, none of the Indians skipped a team meeting to go fishingThe question is though, why would players from the Australian side not be going out partying? From all accounts, Ponting is a very good leader of men and has the whole team behind him. You're not going to go out partying and piss off a captain if he's got your respect, something which Ponting does seem to have from the players in his team. Perhaps the same can't be said of others.
Wasn't Clarke captain on that tour?I don't know man. To the best of my knowledge, none of the Indians skipped a team meeting to go fishing![]()
I don't think Symonds snapped just like that. There must obviously have been a build up leading to those events.Wasn't Clarke captain on that tour?
Isn't that what I meant by he is a good man-manager?I think Ponting has also had to deal with difficult issues as captain. For example, the way he lead the team in the 2003 world cup after Warne getting thrown out just as the matches were starting was really quite excellent. So I think you can complain about his on-field tactics, but his off-field leadership of the team has been exceptional imo.
Want me to quote the same men in the cricinfo round table deciding Sachin and Lara the best of the generation EASILY?????Thats the difference HB, my opiion is based on what Ponting did do and you opinion is based on what you think Tendulkar or Lara could have done. Not really the same is it.
11,000 odd runs @ 55 makes him arguably the best batsman since 1980, not just me but plenty of others too. I dont have a problem stomaching that.
And another thing
Your arguement is week and feeble.
Um... yes... I am agreeing with you.Isn't that what I meant by he is a good man-manager?
Um... yes... I am agreeing with you.![]()
13 explayers and cricket writers selected Ponting 3 selected Tendulkar and 1 selected Lara.Australia captain Ricky Ponting has been chosen as the "ESPN Cricinfo Player of the Decade for the 2000s" by a 38-strong panel of experts, including current and former players.
Ponting beat back the challenge of other current greats of the game including senior Indian batsman Sachin Tendulkar, who is placed sixth in the list. Sitting at the top, the Australian fetched highest 60 points, 23 more than the second placed Protea all-rounder Jacques Kallis (37) who was followed by Ponting's compatriot Adam Gilchrist (29).
Over the past decade, Ponting has scored more runs and centuries in both forms of the game than any other batsman and is the only player to go past the 9000-mark in both forms. The 35-year-old right-handed batsman scored 55 centuries in international cricket during the period, 13 clear of Tendulkar, and was one of only three batsmen to average more than 58 in Tests, a media release said. South Africa's Kallis and Pakistan's Mohammad Yousuf are the two others.
Ponting named best batsman of the decade
Yeah but that was more of a "last straw" kind of thing. And that wasn't even the last straw (he played the NZ and SA series immediately afterwards)Wasn't Clarke captain on that tour?
2000s? Or are you assuming cricket only matters after the turn of the century?????????13 explayers and cricket writers selected Ponting 3 selected Tendulkar and 1 selected Lara.
Pontings claim to best batsman is overwhelming.
I am not really sure if many would dispute the fact that Ponting has been the most successful batsman of this decade.
You must admit its pretty darn impressive to have your peers overwhelmingly vote you the best player for a whole decade.2000s? Or are you assuming cricket only matters after the turn of the century?????????