depends on what you mean by mediocre.. Lara was smashing it against the Aussies and was playing Tait (the quickest thing around back then) as easily as anyone ever did in that WC... As I said, I don't really recall him being bad at any point then.. Maybe during the INdia series he wasn't his usual self but really, Lara had a thing of getting out to mediocre INdian bowlers like Sachin does with a Fernando or other newbies.. Basically, I don't think I have seen anything to change my opinion yet on the matter. Lara by the whiskerest of whiskers (used to a real whisker earlier but Sachin HAS gotten better since that Aussie tour in 2007/2008.) but Sachin overall, clearly.Curious, how'd you backup that statement?
Lara's last year was pretty mediocre, although I agree he was still better than 99% other WI batsmen
Nearly impossible task, as SRs for his earlier career wouldn't be available. It must be around 54.5.Sir Alex, can you find out Sachin's Test strike-rate statistics over his career? cricinfo doesn't list it, presumably because "Balls Faced" wasn't available for some of the earliest Tests he played.
No, I meant the times cricket is being played in.. BTW, I am not sure if any real record exists for this but is there way to see overall SRs in test cricket year by year since 2000 or so?Not meaning Lara was not an ATG, but suggesting that the contention is flawed
This is what I'd like to see as well for Sachin, preferably from 91-92 or whenever they started keeping track of balls faced.No, I meant the times cricket is being played in.. BTW, I am not sure if any real record exists for this but is there way to see overall SRs in test cricket year by year since 2000 or so?
Fair enough. Lara's retirement decision surely generated more "Why now?"s than "Why not?"s.depends on what you mean by mediocre.. Lara was smashing it against the Aussies and was playing Tait (the quickest thing around back then) as easily as anyone ever did in that WC... As I said, I don't really recall him being bad at any point then.. Maybe during the INdia series he wasn't his usual self but really, Lara had a thing of getting out to mediocre INdian bowlers like Sachin does with a Fernando or other newbies.. Basically, I don't think I have seen anything to change my opinion yet on the matter. Lara by the whiskerest of whiskers (used to a real whisker earlier but Sachin HAS gotten better since that Aussie tour in 2007/2008.) but Sachin overall, clearly.
rofl.. I meant Lara has not gotten any worse since 2007 coz, well........., he has not played.Fair enough. Lara's retirement decision surely generated more "Why now?"s than "Why not?"s.
Could you please also explain why you think Lara has not got worse in the last 3 years? Because I can remember him not able to buy a run in 2007 end ICL (agreed it is 20/20 and all that, but he wasn't even middling it). I cannot recollect any other cricketing event he took part in otherwise.
I have Sachin's SRs since 1991 below (covers 157 off 168 matches)No, I meant the times cricket is being played in.. BTW, I am not sure if any real record exists for this but is there way to see overall SRs in test cricket year by year since 2000 or so?
Year Tests Runs Avg SR
1991 2 78 19.50 39.59
1992 7 419 41.90 56.62
1993 8 640 91.42 48.01
1994 7 700 70.00 59.37
1995 3 58 29.00 58.00
1996 8 623 41.53 48.78
1997 12 1000 62.50 50.78
1998 5 647 80.87 75.40
1999 10 1088 68.00 56.43
2000 6 575 63.88 60.27
2001 10 1003 62.68 57.15
2002 16 1392 55.68 54.20
2003 5 153 17.00 39.63
2004 10 915 91.50 56.10
2005 6 444 44.40 44.00
2006 8 267 24.27 53.50
2007 9 776 55.42 52.32
2008 13 1063 48.31 57.11
2009 6 541 67.62 55.83
2010 6 772 96.50 60.07
Year Tests Runs Avg SR
1990 1 49 24.50 46.22
1992 3 195 32.50 48.14
1993 7 586 58.60 69.76
1994 8 996 71.14 63.39
1995 12 1222 67.88 73.61
1996 5 226 25.11 53.3
1997 12 859 40.90 58.79
1998 9 608 43.42 55.12
1999 8 832 59.42 58.92
2000 9 497 29.23 58.95
2001 9 1151 63.94 50.81
2002 7 351 35.10 50.5
2003 10 1344 74.66 63.12
2004 12 1178 58.90 61.38
2005 9 1110 65.29 66.34
2006 10 749 41.61 60.06
Everything being equal, playing is better than not playing, especially when Tendulkar debuted earlier than the Prince, and has continued for another 3 years since the latter retiredrofl.. I meant Lara has not gotten any worse since 2007 coz, well........., he has not played.
What I really mean to say is that Sachin's improvement and form have been spectacular but then Lara has not even played since then, so in my mind at least, that can't be the clincher.
All Viv Richards' fault, tbh.. The King denied The Prince.Everything being equal, playing is better than not playing, especially when Tendulkar debuted earlier than the Prince, and has continued for another 3 years since the latter retired
I'd politely disagree. Lara's FC performances till he got into squad to Pak in winter 1990 was as below:All Viv Richards' fault, tbh.. The King denied The Prince.
[B]Season Played in Matches Runs HS Ave 100 50[/B]
1987-88 (West Indies) 4 145 92 29.00 0 1
1988-89 (West Indies) 8 567 182 51.54 2 1
1989-90 (Zimbabwe) 3 187 145 62.33 1 0
1989-90 (West Indies) 5 313 134 31.30 1 0
[B]Overall 20 1212 182 41.79 4 2[/B]
I didn't say he wasn't, what I am saying is Tendulkar has gone beyond those heights, he has left Lara way behind in run scoring and to me that clearly furthur adds to Tendulkar's legacy, something that Lara can't have anymore.Lara was pretty ****ing epic in the last 3 or 4 years of his career.
That 88 and 89 would have got him into the side, and I would wager it was similar stats that got Sachin in anyways..I'd politely disagree. Lara's FC performances till he got into squad to Pak in winter 1990 was as below:
Code:[B]Season Played in Matches Runs HS Ave 100 50[/B] 1987-88 (West Indies) 4 145 92 29.00 0 1 1988-89 (West Indies) 8 567 182 51.54 2 1 1989-90 (Zimbabwe) 3 187 145 62.33 1 0 1989-90 (West Indies) 5 313 134 31.30 1 0 [B]Overall 20 1212 182 41.79 4 2[/B]
Out of interest, I'd be interested to compare Sachin's record in the last however many Tests, and the equivelant from the end of Lara's career.I didn't say he wasn't, what I am saying is Tendulkar has gone beyond those heights, he has left Lara way behind in run scoring and to me that clearly furthur adds to Tendulkar's legacy, something that Lara can't have anymore.
With Tendulkar, his first year in FC was continuation of a sterling record he maintained since his schooldays. Lara had a poor first season, a good second season and a poor third season. Hardly stuff to "replace" someone like Viv.That 88 and 89 would have got him into the side, and I would wager it was similar stats that got Sachin in anyways..
Well it is settled for me, I didn't say it was settled for everyone and TBH,you will never concede that Tendy is better than Lara even if Tendy played another 20 years and scored with same fluency. Not that it matters much, we all have our preferences .lol.. Lara was forced to retire at 37 when he was still better than any Windies batsmen and perhaps better than most batsmen in the world... I can see the reasons why Sachin could be considered better than Lara but I don't think that is one of them... And there is no real "settled" to this anyhow because Lara has not gotten any worse since 2007, even though Tendulkar has gotten better. It has always been, and will always be, down to personal preference. Just dont see any definitive or qualititive answer to this Vs question at all...
you do understand the word "context" right? depends on how the averages of others were in the same games.. I know for a fact that he happened to have played on some pretty green tracks back then in the Windies, coz that is mentioned by most of his chroniclers.With Tendulkar, his first year in FC was continuation of a sterling record he maintained since his schooldays. Lara had a poor first season, a good second season and a poor third season. Hardly stuff to "replace" someone like Viv.
well, he is yet to improve on the area which I feel is the main reason I lean towards Lara being the better test batsman.. Making BIG hundreds. But yes you are right, there are certain things that can't be done. For instance, Sachin cannot again go back to batting for a downright poor team and it is not his fault but Lara did do it. I don't really see why that can be a problem and as I have posted earlier, I do think the Sachin post 2007 Australia tour is, for me, a much closer contender to Lara as a test batsman than he was earlier.Well it is settled for me, I didn't say it was settled for everyone and TBH,you will never concede that Tendy is better than Lara even if Tendy played another 20 years and scored with same fluency. Not that it matters much, we all have our preferences .
Lara's last 35 tests, (from 2003-04 season till end)Out of interest, I'd be interested to compare Sachin's record in the last however many Tests, and the equivelant from the end of Lara's career.