Yeah it really would. I'm pretty excited about the bowlers on display at the moment though. Amir, Bollinger, Johnson, Gul, Hilfenhaus, Roach, Broad, Anderson, Finn, Southee etc are all 28 or younger.Shows the weakness of Test fast bowling currently in that we have to consider bowlers who have barely played 10 Tests as the # 3.
Let's hope that in 12 months time that we don't have a new batch of names up for consideration, it would show a real lack of progress from the current crop.
This gets asked a lot; I fail to see why people don't realise that he wasn't named with characters from the Latin alphabet and hence it's just a phonetic translation. His name is neither Aamer or Amir; it's something in Arabic (IIRC?) characters that sounds like Amir. He'll probably pick one and stick with it soon, like Shakib did.Just wondering why Amir is spelt Ameer at times?
Yep - we've had the same with Muralitharan/Muralidaran and Aaqib/Aqib Javed.This gets asked a lot; I fail to see why people don't realise that he wasn't named with characters from the Latin alphabet and hence it's just a phonetic translation. His name is neither Aamer or Amir; it's something in Arabic (IIRC?) characters that sounds like Amir. He'll probably pick one and stick with it soon, like Shakib did.
Depends how you look at it. You could also say it shows that the fast bowling stocks are on the rise if so many new names are impressing.Shows the weakness of Test fast bowling currently in that we have to consider bowlers who have barely played 10 Tests as the # 3.
Well, that's probably not correct. In NL is is quite usual to use different names in daily life than names that appear in official documents and archives. Same difference as James-Jim, William-Bill, Stephen-Steve, Michael-Mick. Though I have never actually seen André van Troost's passport, it would be very, very likely that Adrianus is his offical first given name.Yep - we've had the same with Muralitharan/Muralidaran and Aaqib/Aqib Javed.
The real mystery was Somerset's Dutch speed merchant Andre van Troost who for a couple of years was uniformly referred to as Adrianus van Troost which was a complete invention
No matter how badly Johnson looks at times but still he is the best contender for 3rd best fast bowler at the moment!Bollinger so far has taken easy wickets against weak batting sides of Pak & WI. Johnson is clearly the 3rd best fast bowler after Asif & Steyn.
Johnson's far too hot and cold for me personally. When he;s on song he's terrific but otherwise he's soemwhat disappointing. Maybe my expectations are too high.No matter how badly Johnson looks at times but still he is the best contender for 3rd best fast bowler at the moment!
Tbh 'tis is just fast bowlers, but yeah he does deliver and consistently. Just worried he's gonna end his career breaking his back.Johnson's far too hot and cold for me personally. When he;s on song he's terrific but otherwise he's soemwhat disappointing. Maybe my expectations are too high.
For his age, Aamer is a fantastic talent and he delivers as well. Still too inexperienced to be called the third best bowler in the world I'd say but I'd rather give it to him than anyone else. Something about raw fast bowling talent that makes the future seem a little bit brighter.
Because he isn't any good.However, thought Gul was also a gun in the last game.....how come he is not included...he was touching 90mph at times.....
27 tests and 101 wickets is not bad...imoBecause he isn't any good.
Those figures compliment him IMO. He is a T20 bowler and doesn't seem to get the ball to do anything in the Test arena (except those 2 deliveries against Clarke/Hussey).27 tests and 101 wickets is not bad...imo