Yeah, probably.Afridi retiring is pretty ridiculous, what if he gets runs in the next test is he going to change his mind?
Problem is that with crappy batsmen a) they won't have time to put their feet up much b) they won't gain the confidence you get with winning and may start to feel all their efforts amount to nothing and c) they'll be facing batsmen usually with little pressure on them. And don't even start with the fielding.With Waqar's guidance, I think Pakistan's trio could turn into an extremely dangerous pace attack. Gul's bowling surprised me, I thought he'd lost the ability to bowl in Tests due to his recent bad form, but he seems back in form. Would love to see him bowl his yorker more, I do wonder if he does have control over it, because when it does come out, it is genuinely quick and always poses problems, but he tends to bowl it less than once or twice in a spell. Asif bowled well, much has been made of his pace, but when he is accurate, the movement more than makes up for it. Aamer has a lot to learn and I think that he has been overrated recently, he has potential, but it is not realised yet and he spends a lot of time as a run of the mill medium pacer, spraying it about - he has a good deal of control to learn and ways to set up a batsman rather than plonking the ball on the spot.
They did really well to bowl Australia out in both innings on what wasn't a minefield, but the batsmen simply couldn't capitalise.
I don't see much into it. It could be till Pakistan's next series.Afridi retiring is pretty ridiculous, what if he gets runs in the next test is he going to change his mind?
Holding himself wasn't all that much faster tbh.Yes. Holding noted also that Watson should not have got five wickets. Adding this to repeated comments about Asif being too slow at 80mph and we have true incompetance about medium pace bowling from the commentary box.
Holding does seem to overrate his pace and overrate the importance of pace, but having watched him bowl - he was considerably quicker than Asif.Holding himself wasn't all that much faster tbh.
Only about 15 mphHolding does seem to overrate his pace and overrate the importance of pace, but having watched him bowl - he was considerably quicker than Asif.
Yes, but my guess is that SS was going off the World's Fastest Bowler competition readings, which had him in the mid 80s.Only about 15 mph
TBF it's not a huge surprise; Big Bad Bob and Mikey are both fully paid up members of the fast bowlers union. Watson's bowling does look fairly innocuous at this level (he's a bowler who's vastly flattered by the speed gun, IMHO) and Asif only really troubled the batsmen when he broke the 80mph barrier. His early stuff when he was down around 75-77 mph looked toothless, tbh.Yes. Holding noted also that Watson should not have got five wickets. Adding this to repeated comments about Asif being too slow at 80mph and we have true incompetance about medium pace bowling from the commentary box.