• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

A.F.L. Thread II

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
ONE MORE QUARTER!

ONE!

Cotchin and Martin are so awesome in the wet.

I love wet weather footy.

Port too soft.
 

Matt79

Hall of Fame Member
So I guess the way the rest of the AFL feels about Geelong is the way the rest of the cricket world felt about Australia through the McGrath-Warne-Gilchrist-Hayden era?

Port-Richmond - it's like the special Olympics for the AFL.
 

pasag

RTDAS
So I guess the way the rest of the AFL feels about Geelong is the way the rest of the cricket world felt about Australia through the McGrath-Warne-Gilchrist-Hayden era?

Port-Richmond - it's like the special Olympics for the AFL.
Nah, like the Cats aside from Milburn.

Zimbabwe then Richmond, weird weekend of sport.
 

James90

Cricketer Of The Year
****. Turned up at The Gabba at around 6pm to find that it was sold out. Would have been a good game.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Now I know eff all about AFL. I try, but remain largely clueless.

Could anyone tell me why a team that seemed in reasonable nick like Carlton (hit Les, demand it) lose at home by 50 points to one that looked in dire straits? Seems faintly anomalous to the uneducated.
& now Richmond beating Port by 47 in Adelaide? Come on.

Betting scam, surely? :ph34r:
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
See how interesting sport can be when you have a salary cap?
Fair enough and all that, but if Casson's odds were accurate (and, given his chosen profession, I'd hope they weren't far off) Richmond were paying over $7. Even allowing for the cap, the weather and that only two results are realistically likely for them to smash Port seems a helluva turn up to the outsider.
 

benchmark00

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Fair enough and all that, but if Casson's odds were accurate (and, given his chosen profession, I'd hope they weren't far off) Richmond were paying over $7. Even allowing for the cap, the weather and that only two results are realistically likely for them to smash Port seems a helluva turn up to the outsider.
Would suggest that $7 was always overs (didn't see the official odds ftr). Noone has ever won the week after playing in Darwin, that's not to say Richmond were anywhere near favourites, but when you couple that with the wet weather, and the fact that Port are pretenders, then it closes the gap a fair bit.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Brumby the odds changed the minute it was clear what the weather was going to be like.

No team will ever be $7 in those conditions.

Half way through the first quarter I got on Richmond, who were 1 goal up, paying $2.30. The odds closed huge the minute it was clear what the match was going to be like.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Seems like Collingwood enjoy giving up leads btw. Prone to giving away 3-5 unanswered goals at times.

Daniel Rich was awesome.
 

Top