benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
This has all the makings of another heart breaker...
Proceed with caution, Jono.
Proceed with caution, Jono.
Nah, like the Cats aside from Milburn.So I guess the way the rest of the AFL feels about Geelong is the way the rest of the cricket world felt about Australia through the McGrath-Warne-Gilchrist-Hayden era?
Port-Richmond - it's like the special Olympics for the AFL.
& now Richmond beating Port by 47 in Adelaide? Come on.Now I know eff all about AFL. I try, but remain largely clueless.
Could anyone tell me why a team that seemed in reasonable nick like Carlton (hit Les, demand it) lose at home by 50 points to one that looked in dire straits? Seems faintly anomalous to the uneducated.
Nah that's just how Port roll apparently.& now Richmond beating Port by 47 in Adelaide? Come on.
Betting scam, surely?
See how interesting sport can be when you have a salary cap?& now Richmond beating Port by 47 in Adelaide? Come on.
Betting scam, surely?
Fair enough and all that, but if Casson's odds were accurate (and, given his chosen profession, I'd hope they weren't far off) Richmond were paying over $7. Even allowing for the cap, the weather and that only two results are realistically likely for them to smash Port seems a helluva turn up to the outsider.See how interesting sport can be when you have a salary cap?
Would suggest that $7 was always overs (didn't see the official odds ftr). Noone has ever won the week after playing in Darwin, that's not to say Richmond were anywhere near favourites, but when you couple that with the wet weather, and the fact that Port are pretenders, then it closes the gap a fair bit.Fair enough and all that, but if Casson's odds were accurate (and, given his chosen profession, I'd hope they weren't far off) Richmond were paying over $7. Even allowing for the cap, the weather and that only two results are realistically likely for them to smash Port seems a helluva turn up to the outsider.