superkingdave
Hall of Fame Member
Lulz 22/6
Yeah I don't want to be overly harsh on Benham because I just don't think he ih hs good enough but he is not going to get more than about 35 so can he at least do it quickly, is a decent list A player afterall.Quality performance from Warwickshire. It's unfortunate they're not playing Hampshire really, as I'm sure we would have allowed them to get to a competitive total.
We've got Neil McKenzie in the XI, a former Test opener for South Africa, albeit a manufactured one, yet we make Liam Dawson open the batting =/ Where's the logic there? He's a talented young player, but surely McKenzie should be opening with Adams? His form might be pretty terrible, but it's more likely that he'd be a success there for us than Dawson.
We're in an ok position, but batting desperately slowly. Adams has bowled 8.4 overs for 8 runs with Franks bowling 5 overs for 6. I guess at least Adams and Benham are still out there, but it'd probably help if they scored some runs before chucking their wickets away. At least we showed a little bit of killer instinct with the ball, and stopped the opposition getting 400. They still shouldn't have managed 270, but it's an improvement. Think we could be a handy bowling side once we get Kabir back, and possibly Jones towards the end of the season.
yay, deserved it. 99 and out in his last innings against Leicestershire I think. Everybody going well, looking good.Maiden f-c 100 for Alex Kervezee. And scored at a good lick.
Indeed.Not enforcing the follow on? sounds a ****house decision to me
Yep, we might still win the game, but one of the ****test decisions in a long timeNot enforcing the follow on? sounds a ****house decision to me
Or trying to lose it.Chapple trying to make a game of it?
Wish I had some money, would have gone and watched him.Ramps
wish i had some money, would have gone and watched him.
Mckenzie finally in the runs, needs to go on now though,