Don't avoid the filter, Jono. Have edited your post.****
Could strangle him.
Jadeja so ****ing annoying.... Bloody fulltosses...****
Could strangle him.
It's not winning you matches. Economy doesn't. Wickets do. Batting sides have piled up huge scores against India due to lack of wickets. Even if he's got a decent economy, the other bloke is smashed around.Who cares if he doesn't take wickets? Look at that economy rate. An economy rate of 4 is worth its weight in gold in T20, even if he doesn't take wickets.
Yeah, he might run out of deliveries to get a well-deserved hundred.I'm feeling bad for this poor guy.
It's hardly his fault if the other bowlers are crap, though. He's doing his job, and he's doing it bloody well.It's not winning you matches. Economy doesn't. Wickets do. Batting sides have piled up huge scores against India due to lack of wickets. Even if he's got a decent economy, the other bloke is smashed around.
Bowlers are in the team to take wickets, not see off overs. Being a strike bowler, he has to take wickets regularly, but he hasn't taken one yet. He's no better than the other bowlers, at the end of the innings.It's hardly his fault if the other bowlers are crap, though. He's doing his job, and he's doing it bloody well.
Nah economy does win you matches in Twenty20 cricket.It's not winning you matches. Economy doesn't. Wickets do. Batting sides have piled up huge scores against India due to lack of wickets. Even if he's got a decent economy, the other bloke is smashed around.
Haha apologies, had no idea that'd avoid the filter.Don't avoid the filter, Jono. Have edited your post.
That is because the opposition knows playing him for 15 - 20 runs without giving wickets is worth than going after him and losing wickets. Put him in the Aussie team, and see how he'll perform with enough support.Bowlers are in the team to take wickets, not see off overs. Being a strike bowler, he has to take wickets regularly, but he hasn't taken one yet. He's no better than the other bowlers, at the end of the innings.