I agree with you cpr. It is difficult to ignore as it is repetitive but I will not be the person who increases the issue by complaining from now on and hopefully it will stop.
Re-read Andy's post the both of you.It's alright Mitchell, I deleted him from facebook so the harassment is at an all time low. Just went to PFC btw, when are you next back around?
Err, I have said I will ignore him which is the right approach. So what wrong have I done here. Also point out which forum rules I have broken.Re-read Andy's post the both of you.
If you want this to be taken further, you're both certainly going the right away about it.
It's really not.James, you are not to be faulted. The forum is at an all time low right now. Just saw a few threads in cricket chat. It is perfectly understandable you are irritated by all this.
No it hasn't, if anything people have been putting much more of an effort in since the thread has been started.The discussion of forum decline has actually caused a decline in the forum ironically IMO.
Goddddddd, you're so neggy!I thought the initial post by silentstriker was not really needed as I didn't notice the decline myself. But I appreciated the moderators urge to improve the forum. Today, however, I saw may senior members are insulting each other in various threads. The discussion of forum decline has actually caused a decline in the forum ironically IMO. We need to stop this soul searching and just play our natural games.
I haven't had the time to be active on the forum much and I only read cricket chat properly last two days. James mentioned to me some time this week that he has had so many incidents in the forum recently when I was discussing with him and it might be coincidence but I have seen some senior members behaving poorly in some threads. I might be basing it on a small sample size though and might be and hope I am wrong.Goddddddd, you're so neggy!
Like what?Oh and is it just me or is Richard in a perpetually bad mood at the moment? Seems to be posting a lot of harsh stuff.
Easiest example would be the thread by the spam account. Spam account or no, thought your reply referencing a history lesson was uncalled for. Would've been better to simply not post at all.Like what?
(And please don't anyone tell us to stop this line of conversation now - I honestly would like to know what Gegmeister thinks I've been posting that's been over-harsh and abnormally so.)
Small sample size is the curse of much analysis on CW tbf.I haven't had the time to be active on the forum much and I only read cricket chat properly last two days. James mentioned to me some time this week that he has had so many incidents in the forum recently when I was discussing with him and it might be coincidence but I have seen some senior members behaving poorly in some threads. I might be basing it on a small sample size though and might be and hope I am wrong.