Streetwise
Banned
Er no.
Can you tell me what my opinion is then.
Er no.
Much better?IMO Howard has much better qualifications than Anderson.
Unless you're Paul Keating. Would be a great first President of the Australian Republic tbh.Much better?
Being a PM doesn't mean you are qualified for any presidency job.
Agreed, But Howards only qualification is not just PM.Much better?
Being a PM doesn't mean you are qualified for each and every presidency job, no matter what field.
So what is his qualification as a Cricket Administrator ? Please understand that I have no problem with Howard in the ICC, I believe that If Mr. Pawar can be there, then so can Howard.Agreed, But Howards only qualification is not just PM.
Sharad Pawar was president of Mumbai Cricket Association 2001 & on, BCCI president 2005 (fuzzy about the dates) & on and then went on to ICC. Before his MCA stint, he had been active in the administration of other lower profile sports in Maharashtra. So, he does have a > 20 year sports administration record of increasing responsibility, 8 of them in cricket prior to the ICC gig.So what is his qualification as a Cricket Administrator ? Please understand that I have no problem with Howard in the ICC, I believe that If Mr. Pawar can be there, then so can Howard.
Sanz I gave my opinion, I'm not going to get into a petty little arguement where someone claims that running a company or being the treasurer of a nation is different to being president of a cricket board. If you or anyone else thinks that the skill set required to oversee a cricket board is totally different to managing a whole country then so be it.So what is his qualification as a Cricket Administrator ? Please understand that I have no problem with Howard in the ICC, I believe that If Mr. Pawar can be there, then so can Howard.
Oh please, don't quote the wikipedia here. Please list of his achievements as a cricket administrator or for that matter kho-kho administrator.Sharad Pawar was president of Mumbai Cricket Association 2001 & on, BCCI president 2005 (fuzzy about the dates) & on and then went on to ICC. Before his MCA stint, he had been active in the administration of other lower profile sports in Maharashtra. So, he does have a > 20 year sports administration record of increasing responsibility, 8 of them in cricket prior to the ICC gig.
Sanz I gave my opinion, I'm not going to get into a petty little arguement where someone claims that running a company or being the treasurer of a nation is different to being president of a cricket board. If you or anyone else thinks that the skill set required to oversee a cricket board is totally different to managing a whole country then so be it.
One of the major tasks of the position is to deal with the boards of each country and in this field Howard is so far ahead of Anderson it just foolish to discuss it. Another task is to oversee the security arrangements for ICC events something that Anderson has no knowledge of but Howard has so much experience here it boggles the mind.
I could go on but its not even worth argueing because some people just cant see the trees for the forest.
I'm guesing that John Anderson has a tiny bit of background in it, considering that he's been the chairman of NZ Cricket for 15 years, and has been on the ICC executive.One of the major tasks of the position is to deal with the boards of each country and in this field Howard is so far ahead of Anderson it just foolish to discuss it.
Could you be more clearer what you mean by "achievements"? Mumbai won Ranji trophies when he was Prez am not sure that is the kind you are looking for.Oh please, don't quote the wikipedia here. Please list of his achievements as a cricket administrator or for that matter kho-kho administrator.
I have no doubt he has but this would be minescule compared to Howards experience in dealing with leaders of countries and far more complex issues than organising a cricket series.I'm guesing that John Anderson has a tiny bit of background in it, considering that he's been the chairman of NZ Cricket for 15 years, and has been on the ICC executive.
This made me laugh out loud. Keep going, you're good value.I have no doubt he has but this would be minescule compared to Howards experience in dealing with leaders of countries and far more complex issues than organising a cricket series.
I'm willing to listen to any reasonable discussion about where Anderson may be more skilled than Howard but to say just because he was chairman of NZ Cricket for 15 years, and has been on the ICC executive really dosent cut the mustard for me. i'm sorry but I dont think many people know what the job entails and have just taken the opportunity to jump on the bandwagon to take potshots at Howard. Some of these people are even refering back to 1980 and even then have got it completely wrong.
That's seriously unfair. I think you've raised good points, but you're not really respecting others who disagree.i'm sorry but I dont think many people know what the job entails and have just taken the opportunity to jump on the bandwagon to take potshots at Howard. Some of these people are even refering back to 1980 and even then have got it completely wrong.
Nah, he's just trolling to get a reaction.That's seriously unfair. I think you've raised good points, but you're not really respecting others who disagree.
Post reportedNah, he's just trolling to get a reaction.