silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
And he has done absolutely nothing in first class cricket. At least Rohit Sharma has.
Atm neither are good enough. Pujara should be the next cab off the rank. If international experience was a factor, then Kohli should have got a shotAnd he has done absolutely nothing in first class cricket. At least Rohit Sharma has.
A few things to consider before picking the playing 11:cricinfo said:Pitch and conditions
Ever since it became obvious India were losing in Nagpur, speculation was rife that another underprepared track might come to India's rescue in the decider. Not this time. "There is a bit of grass on the wicket so I think the seamers will get a bit of help," MS Dhoni said of the pitch. "It looks quite hard… I don't see much turn happening on the first two days."
Because the Eden Gardens is being redone, the atmosphere won't quite be the same. Forget 90,000, they will struggle to get 45,000 in. "There is no stands on one side of the ground so you can see a bit of breeze going across the field so there will be a bit of help for the seamers," Dhoni said.
We need two spinners too, imo, so I hope he plays 5 bowlers. The potential to pick 3-4 wkts by Mishy would help more (as Ind is looking to pick 20 wkts as quickly as possible) sounds better than a 30-40 by the 6th (7th if you count Dhoni as a batsman) batsman.News channels reporting Dhoni reckons its a seamer. India will probably go in with 3 seamers.
For serious? When Ishant is rated as the second best quick, I think that would be a terrible move. Harbajhan didn't look great in the first Test, but he's still more likely than some of the quicks to take wickets.Yeah, India has to attack. I'd personally have 4 seamers and use sehwag if the pitch starts to turn later on.
I have a good feeling about this match, like it will go right down to the wire.
Four quicks and Harbajhan. Sehwag becomes the 2nd spinner if needed during the second innings.For serious? When Ishant is rated as the second best quick, I think that would be a terrible move. Harbajhan didn't look great in the first Test, but he's still more likely than some of the quicks to take wickets.
That could, quite possibly, be the stupidest single move in history of Indian cricket. Slightly ahead of match fixing and Yuvraj Singh.I'd personally have 4 seamers and use sehwag if the pitch starts to turn later on.
Don't be conservative.That could, quite possibly, be the stupidest single move in history of Indian cricket. Slightly ahead of match fixing and Yuvraj Singh.
I'd love to see it just for the lols.
You don't follow cricket much, do you? As in, the past 80 years?Are Indian fast bowling stocks honestly that bad?
More conservatism. For all you know India could have a Steyn of their own, waiting to burst on the scene given the oppurtunity.You don't follow cricket much, do you? As in, the past 80 years?
Now you're just rubbing it in. While it does seem at times that Indian selectors are blind as Bucknor, they (and we) would've had a clue on this one.More conservatism. For all you know India could have a Steyn of their own, waiting to burst on the scene given the oppurtunity.