. Yo let me tell you something big man, you can't troll me. I am not Richard, i would make you run off this site again & this time crying.Without showing no signs of improvement?
How does that fit in with the FACT that teams don't improve?
. Yo let me tell you something big man, you can't troll me. I am not Richard, i would make you run off this site again & this time crying.
If you aint got any proper to contribute to football argument like myself & Mr.Camps. Dont respond to my posts, i dont have time for your foolish.
Fixed.Why is so much emphasis being placed on the fact that Wales are the 76/77th best side in world?. You have to look at it via my baseless perspective, in which a team would be relegated to an "associate member" pool via confederation.
Imma let you finish, but...no, they need more than a DM now. You just said so yourself.They need DM now
Best use of single quote ever.Not as ***eh as ***eh Liam Camps imo.
Best use of single quote ever.
That system doesn't work though. Fiji would be one of the better nations in Oceania, but they're ****ing **** compared to say....Wales.Are they 100 top teams in world football? No.
Why is so much emphasis being placed on the fact that Wales are the 76/77th best side in world?. You have to look at it via their respective confederation, in which a team would be relegated to an "associate member" pool via confederation.
Thus these hypotetical pre WCQ matches would occur amongsts confederation members. (But of course the associate pool members, could/would still have your normal international friendly match vs teams of another conderation). Just like how in cricket we have the intercontinental cup amongst associate members.
Never did us much harm when we had Petit & Veira, tbh.We need 2 DMs? What?!
Oh its baseless now. But just now you just said you agreed, although technically i dont 100% with this idea.Fixed.
Make up your mind..you said:Ok, I can get on board with this. Have the top 50 nations in the world in their elite pool with automatic qualifying privileges. Then have the rest playoff against each other geographically. So the top, say, 30 of that pool can participate in qualifying for major tournaments.
The only problem being that, at a ranking of 77th, Wales are odds on to be in that top 30, despite being a worthless team.
Actually i think i misquoted your earlier.Imma let you finish, but...no, they need more than a DM now. You just said so yourself.
Yes. Thats the Arsenal i used to respect.Never did us much harm when we had Petit & Veira, tbh.
We already have Song.Never did us much harm when we had Petit & Veira, tbh.
I so totally meant it too.Oh its baseless now. But just now you just said you agreed, although technically i dont 100% with this idea.
Interesting stuff. That's why you said...I misread that you saying the gunner are just one player short of winning the league. I dont think so, just that they need a DM or 2 now & indeed need more than one player to win the title again. So sorry about that..
4 i'd say. Two strong DMs & tall goal-scoring forward who can score 20+ goals a season consistently - which indeed can be RVP & a better GK.
OFC is pretty small compared to the rest of confederations though. Just 6 nations now that Australia have gone to AFC. So if such a rule was implemented you make have to flex with them, since a crap team will qualify anyway.That system doesn't work though. Fiji would be one of the better nations in Oceania, but they're ****ing **** compared to say....Wales.
That's in actual qualifying, you silly billy. Not in imaginary Naziland elitist qualifying.OFC is pretty small compared to the rest of confederations though. Just 6 nations now that Australia have gone to AFC. So if such a rule was implemented you make have to flex with them, since a crap team will qualify anyway.
Plus OFC teams don't always qualify though. Doesn't the winning OFC team usually have to go into a playoff or something?
No no. I am saying get rid of Song & Diaby & get two others. If you gunners fans are satisfied with Song fine - just get of Diaby then.We already have Song.
aussie was saying we need two more DMs.
Or keep him and play him in his actually position... which is not as a DM.No no. I am saying get rid of Song & Diaby & get two others. If you gunners fans are satisfied with Song fine - just get of Diaby then.
Precisely what I was about to say.Or keep him and play him in his actually position... which is not as a DM.