• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Pakistan in Australia

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yes, because I actually ment I'd pick a batsmen as a specialist fielder 8-) I mentioned the fielding because they both seem to be pretty average batsmen but unlike Malik who was dropping catches all series (and even started to not even bother attempting them) Iqbal can catch.
Obviously my argument is that Malik is a much better batsman. As subtly implied in my first post when I said: "Malik is so far superior to Iqbal with the bat, why is this an issue?"

Rather than respond in terms of batting, you focused on the fielding aspect. Surely my assumption of your meaning is understandable?
 

inbox24

International Debutant
If Pakistan can somehow get Fawad into this team (most likely at the cost of Manzoor or Farhat), then it will be at full strength:

1 Imran Farhat, 2 Salman Butt, 3 Khurram Manzoor, 4 Mohammad Yousuf (capt), 5 Umar Akmal, 6 Shoaib Malik, 7 Sarfraz Ahmed (wk), 8 Mohammad Aamer, 9 Umar Gul, 10 Danish Kaneria, 11 Mohammad Asif
 

Xuhaib

International Coach
Khurram Manzoor is one of those guys if he can survive first 10 overs of his innings he can bat for months & months atleast thats what he does in domestic cricket.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Younis Khan?
Yeah, a batting lineup of:

Butt, Farhat, Younis, Yousuf, Fawad, Umar...

.. is not ridiculously bad. It's not great but it's not abysmal either; it's a par Test match top six. What they have at the moment is a prank top six.
 
Last edited:

Xuhaib

International Coach
Yeah, a batting lineup of:

Butt, Farhat, Younis, Yousuf, Fawad, Umar...

.. is not ridiculously bad. It's not great but it's not abysmal either; it's a par Test match top six. What they have at the moment is a prank top six.
it could start looking really good if Umer and Fawad follow up on their promise or it could be really shocking if both end up tanking especially since Younis and Yousuf are on the wrong side of 30's.
 

pasag

RTDAS
Waqar Younis says Mitchell Johnson will be better than Wasim Akram
By Ben Dorries
January 13, 2010


Pakistan pace legend Waqar Younis believes Mitchell Johnson is destined to surge past the great Wasim Akram and become Test cricket's most successful left-arm fast bowler.

As Johnson spoke with pride and passion about what it means to him to lead the new-look Australian attack, Waqar handed him the ultimate accolade.

Waqar said he had "no doubt" the Australia strike weapon would rattle past Wasim's 414 wickets before his Test career is over.

"Nobody is better than Wasim but I have no doubt that if Johnson stays fit he will take more than 400 Test wickets, maybe a fair bit more," Waqar said.

Johnson (142 wickets from 31 Tests) still has a way to go to match Wasim, who tormented the world's top batsmen for 17 years.

But Johnson, 28, already boasts a strike rate of a wicket every 51.88 balls -- superior to Wasim's career strike rate of 54.65.

Waqar, who with Wasim formed one of cricket's most formidable new-ball partnerships, believes Johnson only needs to stay on the field to knock his old teammate off the record books.

"Johnson's record is superb and I think it shows he will have a great Test career," Waqar said. "He is probably at his best right now but there is no reason he can't play for another five or six years which will means he will take a lot of Test wickets."

Johnson's career spike has been so rapid that he needs only 45 more wickets to surpass Alan Davison (186 Test wickets) as Australia's most successful left-arm fast bowler.

He will then have only Wasim, Sri Lankan swing king Chaminda Vaas (355 Test wickets) and Indian quick Zaheer Khan (220) ahead of him in Test cricket's elite left-arm pace club.

Johnson is enjoying an extraordinary revival considering he was on the verge of being dropped during the Ashes last year but then surged to be the world's best-performed paceman with 63 Test wickets in 2009.

He no longer bowls with the new ball but, in Hobart, where the third Test starts tomorrow, he spoke about being the senior leader of an attack containing Peter Siddle (16 Tests) and Doug Bollinger (5 Tests).

"I've played 30 games and some of the guys coming through now have only played a few so

I feel that's my responsibility to speak to those guys about conditions and the guys that we are playing against," Johnson said.

"Going through England was a good test for me and that helped me get to where I am now.

"You've heard guys like Glenn McGrath and Brett Lee talk about peak age being around this age, 27 to 29. I feel like I'm starting to get to know my game a hell of a lot better."

Waqar said Johnson often bowled deliveries that are unplayable.

"He has a slinging action and bowls very close to the stumps and seems to be able to get good reverse swing," he said.

"He is the best bowler in Australia since Brett Lee came on to the scene."
:detective
 

Xuhaib

International Coach
I think he means will overtake him with the wickets not saying he is a better bowler.

Xuhaib says Mohammad Aamer will be better than Mitchell Johnson :ph34r:
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I think he means will overtake him with the wickets not saying he is a better bowler.
Yeah, exactly. Typical case of the journo putting words in his mouth for a headline. I don't like the way he defined "most successful" as "most wickets" throughout the article either.
 

Craig

World Traveller
Malik is so far superior to Iqbal with the bat, why is this an issue? You don't pick a number 3 batsman based on his ability at slip.
Funny how Iqbal averages 10 more runs at FC level then Malik (less then 30 FFS). Even Vettori's FC average is higher. Now before you start, yes stats are not everything, but still, that is quite poor.
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
It's both tiresome and irksome how desperate media sources are by spinning headlines like this. I mean, it's not a new phenomena but I am genuinely getting tired of actually having to do research after reading a piece to make sure what I read was correct.
 

Xuhaib

International Coach
Funny how Iqbal averages 10 more runs at FC level then Malik (less then 30 FFS). Even Vettori's FC average is higher. Now before you start, yes stats are not everything, but still, that is quite poor.
Not that I rate Malik highly but for the first 5-6 seasons he batted 9-10 and only took to batting once he had the shoulder injury which limited him as a bowler.
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Just to clarify, I'm not saying Malik is an awesome batsman. Just that, of the batsmen eligible for Pakistan in Australia right now (Khuwajja anyone?), he's much better than Iqbal.
 

Top