Zinzan
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Bingo....the key point I was making as a neutralBut really this game killed the interest in the series for me.
Bingo....the key point I was making as a neutralBut really this game killed the interest in the series for me.
I think he means that the selectors may be tempted to leave high-achievers like Marcus North in the side, which would be less than ideal in the longer term.It's good for them long term when they're mostly an inexperienced team, and thei inexperienced blokes are learning how to win tight games, especially after the disappointment of England, SA and India over the past year or so.
I think there's a tendency to forget just how inexperienced much of Australia's side is - Johnson's the most experienced bowler and he's played what, 30 odd tests? Watson at the top hasn't played much, neither have North or Haddin, likewise Hauritz.
"High" or "under" achievers?I think he means that the selectors may be tempted to leave high-achievers like Marcus North in the side, which would be less than ideal in the longer term.
True, very true.It should be poor test cricket from Pakistan. But really this game killed the interest in the series for me.
Nothing horrific or malicious, was just a pretty cringeworthy interview with Yousuf.What exactly did Taylor do?
Should've used the symbol, TBH."High" or "under" achievers?
Yes Australia is a decent team on paper and still probably has the best first-class setup. It's good that they find a way to beat weaker teams in the end but they shouldn't be putting themselves in that position in the first place. If you struggle to beat the weakest teams in test cricket at home, it's not a surprise that you will lose to average teams like England.AUS escapes defeat for the third time in 4 matches, this kind of performance is expected from a top team with top players (good records) and I don't think it's good for AUS in the long run even though it saved them some embarrassment today.
Not even comparable considering the qualitative ocean between Australia of 1981 and Pakistan of 2009.This has to be Australia's Headingley 1981. It's quite comparable.
Thought about you earlier Xu. Must be devastating, although I imagine it's starting to seem inevitable to you after those couple of tests against SL last year, the NZ test in Dunedin & now this...ouch !From cricket watching pov this is my worst day Ireland in 07 or Banglore 96 is not even close to this.
Completely agree with this. Even though as a Pakistan supporter, I am happy to have witnessed such a dramatic match.Oh I agree, **** play by Australia for the most part. But I live for the excitement of these moments. If Australia had played well for the most part, then it would have been another token beating and something that doesn't truly excite. The ineptness of both teams has created one of the more extraordinary final days of cricket of all time, and I don't mind that.
Pretty average post. Ponting was little fault for the way Australia batted from the start. Conditions played a factor in what, two or three wickets? I'm sure Ponting did not instruct the Australian batsman to go out and bat with a carefree attitude, and not take pride in there wicket.True, very true.
Ponting started the game with great arrogance and should have paid the price and at the rate ENG is going I wouldn't be surprise if they beat AUS in AUS.
AUS need new and better players, a new captain who is setting a better example for his players because in truth if AUS had lost this game it would have been all ponting's fault.
Exactly - they surely deserve to win the series. Any team with one or two good players will defeat AUS at the moment.Yes Australia is a decent team on paper and still probably has the best first-class setup. It's good that they find a way to beat weaker teams in the end but they shouldn't be putting themselves in that position in the first place. If you struggle to beat the weakest teams in test cricket at home, it's not a surprise that you will lose to average teams like England.
We played far better against England than we did at many times versus Pakistan here. The last Ashes really was hard to judge...we really lost it in moments and over the whole series were quite better than them.Yes Australia is a decent team on paper and still probably has the best first-class setup. It's good that they find a way to beat weaker teams in the end but they shouldn't be putting themselves in that position in the first place. If you struggle to beat the weakest teams in test cricket at home, it's not a surprise that you will lose to average teams like England.
haha...once lead went 125+ did not even bother watching as I said yesterday this game is giving those dreaded vibes the eff up could be seen from miles off.Thought about you earlier Xu. Must be devastating, although I imagine it's starting to seem inevitable to you after those couple of tests against SL last year, the NZ test in Dunedin & now this...ouch !
Ponting is the only captain in the world who would deny his bowlers a go on a good bowling pitch - which isn't common these days.Pretty average post. Ponting was little fault for the way Australia batted from the start. Conditions played a factor in what, two or three wickets? I'm sure Ponting did not instruct the Australian batsman to go out and bat with a carefree attitude, and not take pride in there wicket.